Posted on Feb 22, 2014
SFC A.M. Drake
8.13K
94
38
6
6
0
425f8e37
Posted in these groups: 1024px smiley.svg Humor
Avatar feed
Responses: 23
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited 12 y ago
I have fallen in love with some beautiful, some intelligent, and some beautiful and intelligent people.

What I cannot abide are stupid, unkind, and/or cruel men and women.  I would rather live with dog/cat.

Oops, I missed first part of your question.  My children should be a product of love, kindness, and compassion.  In this instance intelligence and beauty are secondary considerations.  I just want them to be joyous in who they become.

SSG Dominic Delia
SSG Dominic Delia
>1 y
Perfect response! Couldn't add anything more 1LT Annala!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Capt Jeff S.
>1 y
I've seen women that were pretty average in the looks department but who were so sweet on the inside that it just bubbled up and you could see it on the outside. There was something about them that you couldn't put your finger on that made them incredibly attractive.

And over the long haul, you will not always have your looks, but you will always be you -- so I'd have to prefer intelligence to looks.

If you marry a woman based on looks alone, at some point you will wake up next to her and want to have a conversation. If she's a total ditz, you're not going to be happy.

Looks are superficial and only take you so far in life. The older you get the less important looks are, because after gravity hits NOBODY is looking as good in their 50's and 60's as they did in their 20's! LOL
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Military Police
7
7
0
To answer the question, I would prefer my children to be intelligent.

However, I am more concerned with my children being reared properly and growing up to be well rounded gentleman who contribute to our society.  My biggest wish for my children is that they are confident in themselves and their decision. And that whatever they choose to do they find happiness.

I would not consider myself extremely attractive nor extremely intelligent but I sure have a great life and consider myself to be one lucky man who has a beautiful wife and two awesome boys!
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT 94 E Radio Comsec Repairer
7
7
0
SFC Drake, I'd say less attractive and extremely intelligent.  Intelligence doesn't fade, can't be bought or sculpted, and makes him successful enough that his looks don't matter.  Fortunately, any progeny of mine doesn't have to choose. ;)
(7)
Comment
(0)
SGT Mary G.
SGT Mary G.
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) ;)
I agree - no need to choose! A balanced life results in both and more!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Would you rather your child be less attractive and extremely intelligent or extremely attractive and less intelligent?
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
6
6
0
I want both of my boys to be WHO they are regardless of their intellectual or physical components. I want them to be the best they can be in whatever path they so choose to follow and to take responsibility for those choices.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Signal Support Systems Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
My response would be: it doesn't matter, they're my kids. i want them to be who they are.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG V. Michelle Woods
5
5
0
I'd rather my niece be extremely attractive and LESS intelligent. 

Of course the correct answer in our society is "extremely intelligent". I emphasize "LESS intelligent" because your question isn't saying intelligence and aesthetics are mutually exclusive. All my niece needs to be is so-called extremely attractive and MORE intelligent than the average human to be successful. Extreme intelligence isn't necessary. 

Ignorance is bliss and intelligence can be a burden at times. I've found those who are extremely intelligent lack social skills and are too busy being teachers so they forget how to be students. Plus the more intelligent you are the more stupidity you recognize. It can be quite disheartening watching sheep bah. 

"bah" is the sound a sheep makes ;)

Looks fade but you better believe intelligence fades as well. 
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG Laureano Pabon
SSG Laureano Pabon
12 y
SSG, my good looks left , does that mean my IQ is going to go down too?  lol
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
12 y
Who says your good looks left you? ;)
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
>1 y
MSG Cunningham 

Thank God there are people out there who can relate. 





(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Cannon Crew Member
5
5
0
ugly and intelligent is my choice. Looks only get you so much, and at that, its superficial. The most attractive women in the world are ugly as hell once you see who they really are or see how they talk to people. Just walking down the street you see some good looking ladies, but once they walk past you they put their nose up or act like they are better than you... snotty ass, automatically UGLY!!... Its the somewhat attractive ones who have the best personalities. (for the most part) And this I am sure can go the same for males. So, less attractive and intelligent is mine.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
12 y
That is not true! Ugly girls are snobs too. 
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Cannon Crew Member
SSG (Join to see)
12 y
That is true, but im saying that even pretty chics can be ugly, hell anyone can have a crappy attitude, but attitudes weigh more for me than their looks, imo
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
12 y
Now that's definitely true. 

"Just walking down the street you see some good looking ladies, but once they walk past you they put their nose up or act like they are better than you". I have had "less attractive" girls do that to me before which is nuts because I aint even that pretty! 

But yeah attitude is by far the most important thing whether a person is a hottie or an ugo.


(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG(P) Detailed Recruiter
4
4
0

SFC Drake,

     I have two little boys (one 5 years and one 11 months) and I can tell you with confidence I would MUCH rather of had them less attractive and extremely intelligent than the latter of the choices. SPC Thundercloud put it very well; Beauty fades, intelligence does not. Thankfully (and partially biased) they are both smart for their ages and handsome.

(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC A.M. Drake
SFC A.M. Drake
>1 y
SGT(P) Bell,

I would agree with you, as their are too many historical perspectives about how beauty can corrupt oneself if you allow it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Mary G.
SGT Mary G.
>1 y
SFC A.M. Drake - So can intelligence corrupt itself - especially when motivated by greed and control issues!<sigh>
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Richard Riley
3
3
0
with 4 girls and 2 boys in ages ranging from 25 to 9 - it's an interesting question ... but in my case I'd have to say that as long as each of them have a good head on their shoulders & can reasonably stand on their own two feet I'm happy for each of them in their own way. They will grow and pursue their dream hopefully with tenacity and energy to be the best person they can be. Anything else is just icing on the cake. I don't know that being "extremely" one or the other fits the circumstance, but thanks for giving me a moment to think about every one of my kids!
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Merino
2
2
0
I just want my kids happy, considerate of others, and obedient to God. External beauty means nothing when your insides are rotten.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Jeff S.
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
7c1713cc
No sense me being modest, but it doesn't necessarily have to be an "EITHER-OR" LOL...

My daughter at her wedding (she is holding up the bouquet). Her two brothers are in the photo as well. Can you pick them out?
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close