Would you support a standard uniform for all branches of service? Why or Why not?

Every service has a different and unique function. As such each service has a different uniform that people can identify with.

Maybe so for utilities and Infantry Combat Gear, but Marines will never give up Dress Blues for Officers, Staff NCOs, and Enlisted Personnel, and Evening Dress and Mess Dress uniforms for Officers.

Absolutely not. Each branch has a unique and specific role and should be recognized for that.

Absolutely, the different branches have shared a common uniform throughout the past (e.g. OD green and the BDU are two that come to mind) and though I don’t know why the services choose to kill their budgets by choosing a different uniform pattern, I feel that it’s a great idea. First, from an economic standpoint, the overall DOD budget would be reduced (albeit marginally) as only one uniform pattern is used. Secondly, from a logistical view, it would make it easier for the troops who are co-stationed or stationed remotely to be able to purchase new uniform items and AAFES clothing and sales stores don’t have to stock as much merchandise. However, with the ability to order anything through online stores, troops have an advantage.

Not NO, but HELL NO. I became a Marine because I wanted to be one of the elite, not one of the many. I respect the other services, but they are not Marines. Keep the uniforms seperate.

Only a standard utility uniform, dress should stay the same.

It was already done, in the 1960s to late 1970s, fatigues were universal as was the footgear. Head gear was different for Marines and those sailors who wore the OD fatigues. But you could still tell Soldiers from Airmen and Marines from Sailors. I've been watching my tax dollars for the past 20 years being wasted, especially by the AF, Army and Navy on uniform changes that mean absolutely nothing but wasted tax dollars.

No, the needs of the different services are all unique to some degree or another. For the Navy and USCG for example, fire is a much greater hazard than catching a bullet because you were spotted. Uniforms need to be fire retardant, but for most units, cammo is just plain silly. The USCG also has many small boat units, where the ability to move quickly and freely in tight spaces without snagging is important. They also have to interface with the public in a First Responder/LEO capacity on a daily basis. Having said that, when deployed CG units forward deployed such as the personnel in Afghanistan, should and do wear the BDUs of the units they are deployed with.

I fully agree with SSG Scott Brady. He has really nailed it! Your two cents is worth a million. Good to see some common sense prevailing.

With a few caveats and rules, *perhaps*.
Dress uniform? No.
Working uniform? Yes - with the following caveats:
It must be able to fulfill the requirements of the working uniforms of all branches that it's replacing.
It must be fireproof.
It must have enough pockets for the various jobs performed by the men and women wearing it.
It must be able to be fashioned into a flotation device.
It must present a "smart" appearance.
It must be the *final* change of uniform, so that our military personnel can stop wasting money on new uniforms every time some former "brass" gets a job with a clothing manufacturer.