Posted on May 9, 2016
You have been given the authority to change three things in your branch or DoD wide … What are they?
24.9K
424
271
11
11
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 78
******Policy writing needs to have a better review process. There is not process for a class action against a policy. There is only IG, and they only handle one Soldier issue at a time.
ALARACT for Prevention of Sexual Assault
It states that person who have certain offenses cannot serve in positions of trust. They are going back as far as 20 years on Soldiers. I have two outstanding Soldiers that can no longer be Drill Sergeants because of this. One Soldier had a DUI six years ago. I do not believe that getting a single DUI makes you at a higher risk to sexually assault someone. I believe that some of the policies being written do not make sense. Many of these Soldiers identified as level I or II are bowing out because they do not want to relive their mistakes.
There is a policy that states that Soldiers must be licensed on their assigned vehicle. This is moronic because many units such as Drill Sergeant units do not have vehicles. My Soldiers still have to be able to drive military vehicles when sent to various installations. There should simply be a process for licensing other than being dependent on other units for licensing.
********I would issue proper equipment to do the job.
We expect Soldiers to do a ton of things online using tons of bandwidth. Many of my Soldiers in the Inland Northwest live off the grid. We are losing great Soldiers do to the increases computer requirements. Half of the computers do not work in our unit areas. Each unit with 75 Soldiers or more should be assigned at IT person and each Soldier should be issued a government laptop so that they can do their job. Also, all classes should have a download option and upload because it is impossible to do many of the DL without using tons of bandwidth.
**********Special Duty Pay
Special Duty Pay should be extended not only to MOS positions but also to leadership. I spend an excess of at least six hours per week performing military duties. I am told that I can submit a 1380 for points but this takes time. It should be automatic that in certain positions such as 1SG, platoon sergeant, XO, and commander be given an increased amount of pay each month. My husband calls the Army Reserves my "volunteerism" because there is so little pay and so much work that is expected to be done. I believe that if I were better compensated, my family would be more supportive of me being in the military.
ALARACT for Prevention of Sexual Assault
It states that person who have certain offenses cannot serve in positions of trust. They are going back as far as 20 years on Soldiers. I have two outstanding Soldiers that can no longer be Drill Sergeants because of this. One Soldier had a DUI six years ago. I do not believe that getting a single DUI makes you at a higher risk to sexually assault someone. I believe that some of the policies being written do not make sense. Many of these Soldiers identified as level I or II are bowing out because they do not want to relive their mistakes.
There is a policy that states that Soldiers must be licensed on their assigned vehicle. This is moronic because many units such as Drill Sergeant units do not have vehicles. My Soldiers still have to be able to drive military vehicles when sent to various installations. There should simply be a process for licensing other than being dependent on other units for licensing.
********I would issue proper equipment to do the job.
We expect Soldiers to do a ton of things online using tons of bandwidth. Many of my Soldiers in the Inland Northwest live off the grid. We are losing great Soldiers do to the increases computer requirements. Half of the computers do not work in our unit areas. Each unit with 75 Soldiers or more should be assigned at IT person and each Soldier should be issued a government laptop so that they can do their job. Also, all classes should have a download option and upload because it is impossible to do many of the DL without using tons of bandwidth.
**********Special Duty Pay
Special Duty Pay should be extended not only to MOS positions but also to leadership. I spend an excess of at least six hours per week performing military duties. I am told that I can submit a 1380 for points but this takes time. It should be automatic that in certain positions such as 1SG, platoon sergeant, XO, and commander be given an increased amount of pay each month. My husband calls the Army Reserves my "volunteerism" because there is so little pay and so much work that is expected to be done. I believe that if I were better compensated, my family would be more supportive of me being in the military.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
All of the above! As a PL in the Reserves I saw a LOT of fine Soldiers and even NCOs struggling with the Mandatory Requirements, which then swallowed entire quarters of drills, because so many of them didn't have CAC readers, or maybe high-speed internet, or sometimes even a computer at the house, and they couldn't just drive half an hour to the Reserve Center after work and hope someone was there to let them in. One platoon sergeant only had a landline phone until I got him a pre-load from Wal-Mart. It doesn't matter how Mandatory the training is, if the Soldier cannot actually do it, but Big Army doesn't give a rat's arse how many Soldiers can actually DO the training, if it's been deemed Mandatory. And almost none of it was relevant either to combat skills or the unit's mission in any conceivable way.
(0)
(0)
1. No more boards to be a nco it should be a test on your mos and ability to lead in every branch. 2. Restructure the pay system so all soldiers get paid what they deserve. 3. Stop waisting money on dumb crap as far as paying to much for stuff. How does the military pay upward 2 grand for a ar 15 when a civilian can get one for 800 only diff is semi auto with no burst can't tell me that the components for burst cost $800 to $1000. Just an ex they over pay for everything.
(1)
(0)
SP5 Gene Nevill
I am not sure on the weapon side. Most AR available are Chinese not so well made copies. Quality weapons do cost about 1.5 to 2 k. I know that my personal 1903-A4 was well over 2k.
(0)
(0)
Every enlistment is a 5 year active commitment. Oh you want to go Reserve or Guard, first two years of enlistments are with an active duty unit then your last three are with your States Reserve/Guard unit. This would rapidly grow the skill level of Reserve/Guard units and lessen the training curve and APFT issues.
Get rid of CIF. Every recruit gets an initial issue and it's theirs to maintain for the length of enlistment. If they separate early turn in all you issue, if you go the length of your initial contract keep your issue.
Get rid of CIF. Every recruit gets an initial issue and it's theirs to maintain for the length of enlistment. If they separate early turn in all you issue, if you go the length of your initial contract keep your issue.
(1)
(0)
1. Budgeting: A unit keeps 50% of it's "surplus" funds at the end of every fiscal year, and does NOT suffer a "penalty" to it's allocated budget for having "gone over". ie: if unit X asks for a 1 mil budget, and was "awarded" a 1 mil budget, and it only used .8 mil the year before, then it has 1.1 mil to run with the next fiscal year. If Surplus >= 25% of actual spent budget at any point of the year, unit loses any "benefit" they have and only receive enough "new" monies to reach the requested budget. IE: It's December. They were supposed to spend 1/4 of their budget. They have a 30% surplus in the account because of great frugality. They're not gonna "keep" their surplus, they're only getting "topped off" - a "check & balance" to help ensure that units don't start writing astronomical budget requests... (and as usual, waiverable so that oddball conditions like requesting a massive summer training budget can slip through)
2. Have the corporations pay their own R&D, and sell stuff to the military "at cost +X% (a reasonable number, may even be 100% - so an aircraft with 1 million in parts would cost the DoD no more than $2 million each). Using my USAF background, the F35 would still "most likely" be an affordable aircraft if the billions of dollars in R&D behind it wasn't being added into the 200 aircraft that the military's gonna buy right now. If "R&D" costs are an issue (smaller company trying to break in), there can be separate subsidies handed out by DoD.
3. Reexamine the overall "Servicemember compensation" package and apply it, universally, to all Government jobs - House Representatives could be, say, O7s, Senators O9s, Cabinet Leaders O8-O10, President O11, IRS Grunt E3, Supervising Park Ranger E8, etc. This way, when the Civvies need a pay raise, the Servicemembers get one too, I mean, we're all serving our country in various ways, correct?
2. Have the corporations pay their own R&D, and sell stuff to the military "at cost +X% (a reasonable number, may even be 100% - so an aircraft with 1 million in parts would cost the DoD no more than $2 million each). Using my USAF background, the F35 would still "most likely" be an affordable aircraft if the billions of dollars in R&D behind it wasn't being added into the 200 aircraft that the military's gonna buy right now. If "R&D" costs are an issue (smaller company trying to break in), there can be separate subsidies handed out by DoD.
3. Reexamine the overall "Servicemember compensation" package and apply it, universally, to all Government jobs - House Representatives could be, say, O7s, Senators O9s, Cabinet Leaders O8-O10, President O11, IRS Grunt E3, Supervising Park Ranger E8, etc. This way, when the Civvies need a pay raise, the Servicemembers get one too, I mean, we're all serving our country in various ways, correct?
(1)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
I can definitely get behind your Servicemember compensation package and universal pay chart. "IRS Grunt E3" ... You scratched me where I itched!
I'm sure I could get behind your other recommendations but there appears to be numbers in there and I haven't had my coffee yet so I'll have to get back to you.
I'm sure I could get behind your other recommendations but there appears to be numbers in there and I haven't had my coffee yet so I'll have to get back to you.
(1)
(0)
1. Realign the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 4 Star will be Chairman. Each Branch will be a 3 Star. Each branch will have 1 SR Enlisted Advisor. Each Branch will have a "rotation" for Chairman every 3 years along with each branch. Once completed with their tour they retire. No "shuffling" around. 2nd and 3rd order effects with this will trickle down for appropriate rank.
2. It was said in another post, but "revamp" the acquisition process. Get "rid" of the "Military Industrial Complex". Any and all services and products will be American made by Americans in America.
3. 1 standardized uniform (utility/duty) for ALL services. Dress uniforms can stay branch specific.
2. It was said in another post, but "revamp" the acquisition process. Get "rid" of the "Military Industrial Complex". Any and all services and products will be American made by Americans in America.
3. 1 standardized uniform (utility/duty) for ALL services. Dress uniforms can stay branch specific.
(1)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
In 2005-2006 I absolutely refused to put on the ACU since DBDUs were still authorized. I'd like to throat punch the decision maker who green lit the ACU and follow the money to see which Congress reps and Senators got those kick backs.
I had Privates asking me "Why can't we have BDU's like the Marines". I had to bite my tongue to keep from sounding negative in front of them especially since I agree that the USMC digital patterns are superior even to my beloved DBDU.
Don't get me wrong, if the US Army ever had to fight in a eucalyptus forest or in a gravel pit, I'm all in for the ACU because then AND ONLY THEN would that ridiculous POS camo pattern actually blend in with something.
I had Privates asking me "Why can't we have BDU's like the Marines". I had to bite my tongue to keep from sounding negative in front of them especially since I agree that the USMC digital patterns are superior even to my beloved DBDU.
Don't get me wrong, if the US Army ever had to fight in a eucalyptus forest or in a gravel pit, I'm all in for the ACU because then AND ONLY THEN would that ridiculous POS camo pattern actually blend in with something.
(2)
(0)
1) No more wasting printer paper on 2404s and 5988s for weekly PMCS when no faults are being annotated.
2) No more than 1 additional duty per Soldier.
3) RFID tags on all equipment. No more pencil whipped inventories. Every sensitive item gets scanned every month. All others scanned annually.
2) No more than 1 additional duty per Soldier.
3) RFID tags on all equipment. No more pencil whipped inventories. Every sensitive item gets scanned every month. All others scanned annually.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Rene De La Rosa
Outstanding recommendations all. I do appreciate the RFID tags; take advantage of the modern technology while it is hot. It also helps to be able to monitor where a piece of equipment is within a facility.
(1)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
In 1985 I remember my my Drill SGT telling me that we were a bunch of spoiled Privates who were going to be part of this new "Paperless Army".
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
MSG (Join to see) - My office is full of papers! I think the army uses more paper now than ever.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
I like your points, except one and three already exisit. we need to retrain the maintenance system to accomplish number one, and IUID is almost a reality.
(0)
(0)
go back to the Woodland Camouflage BDU's & Black Leather Boots, reinstate Road Guard Vests, & keep the PT Standards and MOS Restrictions as they are
(0)
(0)
Civilian validation for job experience (certifications, more applicable college credits, union acknowledgement, etc.)
Require all civilians to spend a term of service in no less than the national guard or reserves in order to earn citizenship (local born or not), but let them still volunteer.
Get rid of FSRs and other contracted support and let us control our own systems again. If your personnel can't get the job done than train them better and don't simply accept when they claim to not be proficient.
Require all civilians to spend a term of service in no less than the national guard or reserves in order to earn citizenship (local born or not), but let them still volunteer.
Get rid of FSRs and other contracted support and let us control our own systems again. If your personnel can't get the job done than train them better and don't simply accept when they claim to not be proficient.
(0)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
Civilian validation for job experience ... Are you saying for example, an Army Paralegal (27D) would be recognized as a paralegal in the civilian world? If so, I agree but the training would take much longer.
Drives me crazy that resident aliens who volunteer to serve are still required to jump through hoops to be a citizen. That said, though I would be in favor of granting instant citizenship, it would only be good once signed on for a ... four AD year tour.
Drives me crazy that resident aliens who volunteer to serve are still required to jump through hoops to be a citizen. That said, though I would be in favor of granting instant citizenship, it would only be good once signed on for a ... four AD year tour.
(1)
(0)
(1) LIK for Reserve Soldiers living 40 Miles or more away from unit footprint. (2) no age limits for becoming a warrant officer. (3) Berets in garrison PCs in the field.
(0)
(0)
Educate all members of the armed forces in the U.S. Constitution and The Bill of rights. Remove all Muslim Solders from our Armed Forces. Remove from political office immediately those that are at work destabilizing this country and those who are seeking to weaken our Unite States Armed Forces.
(0)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
I can get behind you 100% on the education of the U.S. Constitution and The Bill of rights. Point three there are mechanisms in place. Point 2 ... We'll agree to disagree.
(0)
(0)
SPC Robert Conway
So you want to educate people to the Constitution, then wipe your ass with it by ignoring the First Amendment freedom of religion and initiating a military coup?
(1)
(0)
CPL Steven Toal
Get educated about Islam Islam is not a religion it is a political movement .Islam means submit.! Muslims are not a race they encompass all skin colors..their Sharia law is not compatible with our US CONSTITUTION and Bill OF rights..ISLAMS SWORN PURPOSE IS TO over throw all governments ..Under Sharia law you have no rights..Islam is not a peaceful so called religion in case you haven't noticed...I wipe my ass with their qua ran ! Islam is a threat to you and your family ..OPEN YOUR EYES .
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Policy
DoD
Improvements
