Avatar feed
Responses: 1
SGT Damaso V Santana
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
We are surrounded by trolls who by down voting and blocking us pretend to suppress our right to free speech, only the progressive Libtard story is the allowed one, anything else is not permitted.
Sorry, not on our watch, we will down vote and block you just the same as you do to us, is a game two can play, and eventually only one side will have a say. That is called a dictatorship and it is what you pretend to create in here, it will not happen. This is a free forum and if you cannot agree to disagree then leave.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
SGT Damaso V Santana
>1 y
Thanks, appreciated.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited >1 y ago
802939a
SGT Damaso V Santana - HOW DARE YOU CRITICIZE THE REPUTATION OF A THIRTY THREE YEAR VETERAN OF THE AGENCY . . . WHO PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED HIGHLY CLASSIFIED INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS FOR BOTH REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS -- INCLUDING BOTH THE CONGRESS AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT??? The sad purported news rag quoted is publishing nothing more than a reputation smearing pack of lies. Please find yourself a more credible source of information than a website specializing in piling speculation on speculation to libel honest hard working intelligence officials while providing no traceable references to original sources and reports on which their speculations are based ! ! ! Before you lay blame on the acting (i.e. temporary) intelligence director get your story right ! ! !
Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WND

SPC Randy Semanko
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
SPC Randy Semanko - You didn't originate the thread - but you endorse and reiterate the besmirching of a true patriot's name. Sandy :(
SGT Damaso V Santana
SGT Damaso V Santana
>1 y
Your sources are leftist/progressive rags, not to be believed
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
SGT Damaso V Santana
>1 y
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
SPC Randy Semanko - You are attacking an old friend and colleague . . . who is a true patriot loyally serving Republican and Democratic administrations for more than three decades . . . and who has been personally responsible for enhanced transparency and accountability . . . and improved domestic and international security. How dare you attack this fine member of the loyal opposition. While you are legally allowed to run off your mouth in any way you please . . . our democracy prescribes both criminal and civil penalties . . . and our society prescribes potentially more satisfying personal retribution. With respect to Damaso Santana . . . what kind of "man" snipes at honorable patriots . . . then blocks any vote or comment that contradicts his dishonorable remarks? I, for one, believe in open discussion to improve understanding and potentially resolve any personal and political disagreements, You run off your mouth about another person about whom you obviously know nothing . . . then run away like some infantile juvenile delinquent from any reasonable response to your irresponsible speculation, innuendo, and outright lies and damn lies. You should be ashamed of yourself for taking a shot then quietly running away before any kind of reasonable answer to your attack is allowed to land in your lap. Sandy :)

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close