13
13
0
Okay, chances are that you are neither truly toxic nor a micromanager, but based on your actions you may be perceived as such. During the last step in the Troop Leading Procedures, Supervise and Refine, is when subordinates can form an opinion that their leader is a micromanager.
Generally, Leaders stumble in this area because of their supervision techniques. Try these three techniques to help you avoid being a micromanager:
Formulate a detailed plan early- This allows your subordinates to understand, resource, and plan the task at their level well in advance of execution. This is what good Majors do for our Divisional units.
Establish a disciplined reporting culture- This is just like the priorities of work tracking chart in the Command Post, but you need it for every operation. This gives your subordinates autonomy and allows you to ensure the mission gets accomplished. You are still required to inspect, spot check, and refine, however, a disciplined reporting culture makes these checks better focused and frankly less disruptive.
Accept risk at your level- Many young leaders pass down all of the risk to the Company level. As a senior leader, you must help the command manage risk to protect the companies. Identifying where the unit can accept prudent risk prevents leaders from focusing on tasks that are not mission essential.
If you formulate a detailed plan, create a culture of disciplined reporting, and manage risk properly- you will be a more effective Leader.
Remember to go to the ProDev2Go Wordpress and click the Blue Box to Follow ProDev2Go and receive these posts directly in your email.
Generally, Leaders stumble in this area because of their supervision techniques. Try these three techniques to help you avoid being a micromanager:
Formulate a detailed plan early- This allows your subordinates to understand, resource, and plan the task at their level well in advance of execution. This is what good Majors do for our Divisional units.
Establish a disciplined reporting culture- This is just like the priorities of work tracking chart in the Command Post, but you need it for every operation. This gives your subordinates autonomy and allows you to ensure the mission gets accomplished. You are still required to inspect, spot check, and refine, however, a disciplined reporting culture makes these checks better focused and frankly less disruptive.
Accept risk at your level- Many young leaders pass down all of the risk to the Company level. As a senior leader, you must help the command manage risk to protect the companies. Identifying where the unit can accept prudent risk prevents leaders from focusing on tasks that are not mission essential.
If you formulate a detailed plan, create a culture of disciplined reporting, and manage risk properly- you will be a more effective Leader.
Remember to go to the ProDev2Go Wordpress and click the Blue Box to Follow ProDev2Go and receive these posts directly in your email.
Leadership
Leadership Development
Command Post
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 8
4
4
0
LOL, great pic. Show the goal, define the path, then trust your guys. They know their job better than you do.
(4)
(0)
4
4
0
I have worked for 3 micromanagers...one was completely risk averse and only wanted to know who to blame (hold accountable), the other was fixated on slide appearance (and her way was the right way) and the final one...I still to this day do not know what this person wanted, but I had no authority in that unit.
the frustrating thing, from their superiors' perspective, the mission is getting done...so, in a sense, micromanagement is rewarded - its only painful for the micromanaged, all 3 did well for themselves.
the frustrating thing, from their superiors' perspective, the mission is getting done...so, in a sense, micromanagement is rewarded - its only painful for the micromanaged, all 3 did well for themselves.
(4)
(0)
CPT Jason Mitchell, MBA
Sir, I've lived through this twice, both the same leader, but in different roles in different units. The sad part is the Micromanager/Toxic Leader knew how to build alliances within the unit, and looked great on paper; thus impressing the BN CDR in the first unit, and the BDE CDR in the second unit. Unfortunately, those of us below him (I was a PL when he was an S3, and a Battery CDR when he was my BN CDR in the second unit) were so abused and beat up professionally and emotionally that we had many of the Staff and Battery Leaders looking to the PA for meds and had to undergo psychological help. We had just returned from a very difficult Afghanistan deployment and had a terrible Rear-D chain that took no effort to account for equipment. We had a big mess to clean up, and then this guy came in to command and tried to burn us all at the stake. Instead of helping us figure out the jumbled mess, he threw more on us than any human could handle. Many of the former leadership under this guy are now out of the Army or changed branches just to keep from being directly in his path again. He almost broke an entire chain of command's will to live (let's just say I know what the business end of my .45 tastes like). If that isn't enough to get the ear of the BDE Leadership, I don't know what is. The guy is a "teflon-don" and nothing can stick to him. Sadly, I fully expect to see him on CNN someday leading a Division into combat with a star or four on his shoulders or center mass. The Army's effort to clear out toxic leaders is about as effective as a wet blanket.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
In my experience, micro managers almost invariably have a self confidence problem, hence are scared, hence want to muck with everything. A worse case is a great macro who got terrorized so badly with a failure laid at their feet, they become evil incarnate micros. Saw that happened with an O-3 that got traumatized on some tour, came back as an O-6, and you wouldn't have recognized him. His one hour staff meetings were about 40 minutes of him directing and 10 berating. I was a senior O-6 who sat in on one of them and I recorded a minute by minute record of what was happening. When I went over it later with him, he acknowledged the record was correct but that's what he had to do because all his staff were such complete idiots. Second aspect of a micro is they're incapable of trust. Third aspect is everyone is out to get them.
BTW some folk here are confusing "detail" with "micro". It's OK to plan in detail, but better to execute in macro mode and trust the staff to work out the details or problems with them on the fly. Remember, no plan survives contact with the enemy. Semper Gumby.
BTW some folk here are confusing "detail" with "micro". It's OK to plan in detail, but better to execute in macro mode and trust the staff to work out the details or problems with them on the fly. Remember, no plan survives contact with the enemy. Semper Gumby.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google