102
102
0
Why do we continue to have Special Observances? After all, with open service for all, haven’t we mastered Diversity and Inclusion by now?
Good question. And the answer is…no; not by a lot. President Truman integrated the armed forces in 1948. 81 years later, African-Americans still suffer from discrimination and bigotry throughout society, and yes, even within our military. Women have been part of America’s military tradition since 1775, but not always openly. During the Revolutionary and Civil Wars, they participated in ancillary roles, and when in combat, they did so disguised as men. The first woman to enlist, as herself, was not until 1917. There were no women in the academies until 1976! And women were not part of combat units until 2016; prior to that year, they had served in combat as war does not stay within boundaries too well. They distinguished their efforts with Honor, and enthusiasm.
In the realm of LGBTQ+, it has been even more complicated. While these individuals have served throughout our history, it has only recently been openly. Prior to President Clinton and the introduction of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, discovery of one’s homosexuality or other queerness was grounds for immediate discharge. With DADT, one could serve, as long as no one ever found out. For those who have not had to hide major parts of their life else face loss of their livelihoods do not know the fear which enveloped these Servicemembers. At any moment, one’s career could come to a crashing end. In 2010, DADT ended and open service was welcomed for the LGB.
That is not a typo. LGB could openly serve, but still the transgender individuals could not. The fear continued. 30 June 2016, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter opened service to transgender individuals. And while the next administration reversed course, in 2021, President Biden restored open service.
So, we are good! Laws, regulations, policies and orders have brought all of us into service for our country, regardless of race (1948), being female (2016), sexual orientation (2010), and gender identity (2021). Yet, Servicemembers are still harassed. Discrimination occurs regularly. Sexual harassment and sexual assault are shockingly not rarities, but commonly shared histories amongst our ranks. Open bigotry is less often found, yet a visit to social media will quickly reveal the dark bigotry alive and well.
These observances, then, are still essential. More so, they must not be “check-the-box” activities. Too, they should not be events where your absence is noteworthy; attendance may not be mandatory, but you had better be there. We often celebrate distinctions of our individual groups, and slowly more often, we utilize these opportunities to learn about those to our left and right in America’s formations.
Any self-respecting infantry Soldier will tell you that without them, no one will win a war. True, but it is the diversity in our job fields that enables that Soldier to fight and win. Cooks, supply, medics, intelligence gatherers, and clerks may not be the image of the combat Soldier, yet without them, that Soldier will soon be hungry, out of bullets, possibly wounded, unsure of where the enemy is or how strong and worse – not being correctly paid! It takes an Army to be an Army. And an Air Force to parachute them (Airborne!), bomb the enemy, and bring more supplies. The Navy, and with them, our beloved Marines, achieve many of those results on the world’s oceans.
Thus, since we recognize that we need all these parts to make an overwhelmingly strong whole, that we need that Diversity, and that all are important and play a role, why is it so difficult to recognize that is true within our ranks? As our skills, intelligence, and talents are spread throughout the services, so are they spread throughout our individuals. Men bring their strengths and talents, as do women, persons of color, LGBTQ, and our whole spectrum. We are all valuable.
Diversity is our force multiplier. Together, we are successful. Our nation protects and defends our Constitution by living the freedoms enshrined within that very document.
Out of many, one.
Good question. And the answer is…no; not by a lot. President Truman integrated the armed forces in 1948. 81 years later, African-Americans still suffer from discrimination and bigotry throughout society, and yes, even within our military. Women have been part of America’s military tradition since 1775, but not always openly. During the Revolutionary and Civil Wars, they participated in ancillary roles, and when in combat, they did so disguised as men. The first woman to enlist, as herself, was not until 1917. There were no women in the academies until 1976! And women were not part of combat units until 2016; prior to that year, they had served in combat as war does not stay within boundaries too well. They distinguished their efforts with Honor, and enthusiasm.
In the realm of LGBTQ+, it has been even more complicated. While these individuals have served throughout our history, it has only recently been openly. Prior to President Clinton and the introduction of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, discovery of one’s homosexuality or other queerness was grounds for immediate discharge. With DADT, one could serve, as long as no one ever found out. For those who have not had to hide major parts of their life else face loss of their livelihoods do not know the fear which enveloped these Servicemembers. At any moment, one’s career could come to a crashing end. In 2010, DADT ended and open service was welcomed for the LGB.
That is not a typo. LGB could openly serve, but still the transgender individuals could not. The fear continued. 30 June 2016, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter opened service to transgender individuals. And while the next administration reversed course, in 2021, President Biden restored open service.
So, we are good! Laws, regulations, policies and orders have brought all of us into service for our country, regardless of race (1948), being female (2016), sexual orientation (2010), and gender identity (2021). Yet, Servicemembers are still harassed. Discrimination occurs regularly. Sexual harassment and sexual assault are shockingly not rarities, but commonly shared histories amongst our ranks. Open bigotry is less often found, yet a visit to social media will quickly reveal the dark bigotry alive and well.
These observances, then, are still essential. More so, they must not be “check-the-box” activities. Too, they should not be events where your absence is noteworthy; attendance may not be mandatory, but you had better be there. We often celebrate distinctions of our individual groups, and slowly more often, we utilize these opportunities to learn about those to our left and right in America’s formations.
Any self-respecting infantry Soldier will tell you that without them, no one will win a war. True, but it is the diversity in our job fields that enables that Soldier to fight and win. Cooks, supply, medics, intelligence gatherers, and clerks may not be the image of the combat Soldier, yet without them, that Soldier will soon be hungry, out of bullets, possibly wounded, unsure of where the enemy is or how strong and worse – not being correctly paid! It takes an Army to be an Army. And an Air Force to parachute them (Airborne!), bomb the enemy, and bring more supplies. The Navy, and with them, our beloved Marines, achieve many of those results on the world’s oceans.
Thus, since we recognize that we need all these parts to make an overwhelmingly strong whole, that we need that Diversity, and that all are important and play a role, why is it so difficult to recognize that is true within our ranks? As our skills, intelligence, and talents are spread throughout the services, so are they spread throughout our individuals. Men bring their strengths and talents, as do women, persons of color, LGBTQ, and our whole spectrum. We are all valuable.
Diversity is our force multiplier. Together, we are successful. Our nation protects and defends our Constitution by living the freedoms enshrined within that very document.
Out of many, one.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 24
The rainbow mafia is relentless in their demands. If you're of that persuasion zip your lip and soldier on.
(1)
(0)
Your political leaders do not believe in the very document you hold so true.
(1)
(0)
You just post shit to post shit now. The crap in this article does not occur today, maybe 10 years ago, but not today. Stop writing this BS
(1)
(0)
A study conducted by a guy at the VA found that the incidence of transgenderism in the military is higher in the veteran population than in the general public. His conclusions were two fold for FTM the ability to move and function in an environment where the females masculinity would not be called into question was a preferred work area; and for MTF the drive to try and prove ones manhood resulted in higher performing soldiers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristin_Beck.
I would rather have this woman in my foxhole, than any of you homophobic strait guys.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristin_Beck.
I would rather have this woman in my foxhole, than any of you homophobic strait guys.
(1)
(0)
SPC Chris Ison
SGT Nickolas Ortiz - You didn't question the facts you dismissed them outright.
You didn't even put a counter argument up.
The fact that you doubled down shows, again, your homophobia. The only eon playing the victim around here is you.
The mean specialist called me homophobic; mommy, make hm stop.
I got your number, your the kind of guy who leads with stripes.
You didn't even put a counter argument up.
The fact that you doubled down shows, again, your homophobia. The only eon playing the victim around here is you.
The mean specialist called me homophobic; mommy, make hm stop.
I got your number, your the kind of guy who leads with stripes.
(0)
(0)
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
SPC Chris Ison - WOW... you and your gender bias... you called me "guy" without asking my pronouns... shame on you!
They're You Highness, Your Majesty, My Lord... please respect my gender pronouns...
They're You Highness, Your Majesty, My Lord... please respect my gender pronouns...
(0)
(0)
SPC Chris Ison
SGT Nickolas Ortiz - Oh I am sorry Gal, I did not men to offend you miss. I did not realize you were the kind of broad who cared about such things. Next time I will not assume that a person with the Name Nickolas throwing aorta homophobic shade is a man. Your Right Woman, I should have asked your woman pronouns first.
But lie I always say if the worst thing that happened to you is someone called you a dude when your a dudette you have had a good life.
It doesn't help that i served, in the military, units where dames like you couldn't serve.
Right Miss?
I can do this kind of stupid shit all day.
But lie I always say if the worst thing that happened to you is someone called you a dude when your a dudette you have had a good life.
It doesn't help that i served, in the military, units where dames like you couldn't serve.
Right Miss?
I can do this kind of stupid shit all day.
(0)
(0)
SMSgt Billy Cesarano
It is irrelevant. Holds no more credence than any present choices of former military members, whether someone becomes a tycoon, clergy, criminal etc. They served honorably while a member, within the dictates of the force structure at the time.
(0)
(0)
SSG, well, let me try to answer this one with a few less lines. The NEW AND IMPROVED military is going WOKE what with CRT, 1619 Project, and Gen Milley going off on a tangent. I'll tell you how the military works best together regardless of race, color, creed, gender, etc. and that is when some dude downrange is popping caps at you. Or maybe you're on the Bearing Sea with a raging storm blowing 50 knts and 35–40-foot seas and the water temp is 34 deg. and such similar situations. When your butt is in the ever-loving sling the only thing you want to see is a "good guy camo" coming to bail you out, or some coxswain taking you back to your Cutter in that storm. We're all taught teamwork. "None of this individuality stuff." as Gen Patton would say. I've found that if you've been in for more than 16 weeks, you get the idea how it's all supposed to work, otherwise your longevity is going to be cut real short. Now let me pop your balloon for a moment. This military of ours is filled with politicians (E-7,8 and 9) and (O-6 to O-10). It's about the Star! There is something about the Star that makes you function like a congressman. Ever hear of Ring Knockers? Nothing wrong with politics as long as it does not screw up the mission, unit, or personnel. Now this politics is not necessarily fair, but it is there, and it will always be there as long as there is a carrot to bite.
(1)
(0)
Its to bad that many organization dont embrace DIVERSITY as a MULTIPLIER!
(1)
(0)
CWO4 Terrence Clark
SFC David Reid, M.S, PHR, SHRM-CP, DTM
As a 26+ year Navy mustang and 21+ year Director level HR wienie (PHR, ALRA, APPT certified) with Fortune 500 companies, it has never been my experience that DIVERSITY (as defined by SHRM and EEOC) is a MULTIPLIER. Affirmative action hiring breeds mediocrity. Passing over a more qualified candidate for a candidate that ensures your annual Impact Analysis report to keep the EEOC and potential lawsuits off your back is one of the great tragedies inflicted on the American worker. Hell, to my everlasting shame, I've even made and/or supported such decisions myself. Fiduciary responsibility to the company and all that Pap. The existing employees see the process and are threatened, the qualified applicant is embittered, the less qualified applicant knows and is never comfortable. No sense of fairness, justice, company loyalty or camaraderie comes of it. As if AA was not corrosive enough to unit cohesiveness, SHRM went full "woke" in the 90s when they discarded meritocracy for diversity, assimilation for multiculturalism. Sgt Tim Horton CMSgt Marcus Falleaf Sgt (Join to see) SGT Nickolas Ortiz MSgt John Hamilton PO1 Mike Wallace LTC David Brown LTC Francis Irwin
As a 26+ year Navy mustang and 21+ year Director level HR wienie (PHR, ALRA, APPT certified) with Fortune 500 companies, it has never been my experience that DIVERSITY (as defined by SHRM and EEOC) is a MULTIPLIER. Affirmative action hiring breeds mediocrity. Passing over a more qualified candidate for a candidate that ensures your annual Impact Analysis report to keep the EEOC and potential lawsuits off your back is one of the great tragedies inflicted on the American worker. Hell, to my everlasting shame, I've even made and/or supported such decisions myself. Fiduciary responsibility to the company and all that Pap. The existing employees see the process and are threatened, the qualified applicant is embittered, the less qualified applicant knows and is never comfortable. No sense of fairness, justice, company loyalty or camaraderie comes of it. As if AA was not corrosive enough to unit cohesiveness, SHRM went full "woke" in the 90s when they discarded meritocracy for diversity, assimilation for multiculturalism. Sgt Tim Horton CMSgt Marcus Falleaf Sgt (Join to see) SGT Nickolas Ortiz MSgt John Hamilton PO1 Mike Wallace LTC David Brown LTC Francis Irwin
(2)
(0)
CWO4 Terrence Clark
Sgt Tim Horton They are trying. As I've posted several times before. It is up to us to be "that guy". We know how to project confidence. We understand leadership. We have been tested under the roar of the big guns. We need to be "that guy" at town council meetings. We need to volunteer at our precincts. If we have kids or grandkids, we need to be active in their schools. We need to think Cogently and logically when presenting our views. We need to be that guy and defend our views. We need to revel in ownership. We need to be "that guy".
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Sgt Tim Horton Because I'm the very best at what I do and I'm Trans. Throw in my uncanny abilities with firearms, an IQ north of 150 and an assortment of other skills what is there that does not make me a force multiplier. But I must say I do lack your ability to be closed minded and ignorant. Tha k theory for that blessing.
(0)
(0)
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
HOW does "diversity" become a "multiplier"... unless you're looking to multiply your losses. NO, "diversity" does NOT help. PERIOD. Never before in human history has "diversity" helped a civilization. Diversity for diversity's sake does not get the best and brightest. You get a "dumb down' version of what you're trying to achieve. DIVERSITY of thought, THEN you have a "multiplier"... having everyone think the same way tends to limit your opportunities...
(0)
(0)
Sgt, as in the civilian world so it is in the military world; politics is everywhere and not necessarily for the good of the organization or it's people. I chose Warrant over a Direct for those reasons. You will not be able to hide from it, you must; however, learn to exist living with its beastly head spewing fire. Do not try to be the Dragon Slayer that has been tried and the field of battle is littered with challengers but on the other hand do not sell out to political hacks and buy the Snake Oil they offer. You do what is required of you and then some. Do not tarnish your brass. You will win some and lose some, it is the way it is. It may not be right or seem fair, but lately meritocracy has been cast to the wind and Readiness has been the victim.
(0)
(0)
There is little to be thankful of when one reaches my own great age. But one thing I am grateful for is that my military career was spent in a era when the purpose of our armed forces was simply to fight and win wars. That now once noble military service seems overwhelmingly defined by those endlessly whimpering about "gender" and "feelings" is to me beyond distasteful. For you who serve today I have great pity. For my country I have great fear.
(0)
(0)
In 1975 I was the only E-7 Chief Lithographer in the entire Navy who passed the E-8 exam. I expected to be advanced but I was wrong. I received a notice from the Testing Center that I would not be advanced due to AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. I was aware of it but did not expect it to apply to my rate. I was also informed that a Naval Reserve Chief Lithographer, who was black, was getting the Billet. They gave me his name because we were both attached to the Encino, California Naval Reserve Center. I not only knew the man I also knew that he had not worked in PRINTING for more than 10 years and that he had not taken the exam in more than 15 years and did not qualify. I informed the Testing Center of this and they said that he was black and that was all that mattered. I enlisted in 1961 and made Chief in 1971 and was not advanced until 1972. From 1975 until I was asked to retire in 1990, there was never a Billet for E-8 or E-9 Lithographer yet I was told that I HAD TO RETIRE AS I WAS NOT ADVANCING IN RATE. It did not matter that I was the Command Chief Petty Officer for 17 years and Administrative Department Head in lieu of a Lieutenant and Assistant Training Officer with a full Commander who did nothing. Or that I was instrumental in developing a "Sound Silencing Program," for the Submarine Fleet. I was Retired in February of 1990 and recalled in July of 1990 to go to Pearl Harbor and teach the Sound Silencing Program to ALL the Submariners stationed there. I received free airline passage to and from Hawaii, free room and board but no pay. My I.D. cards expiration date is INDEFINITE. MAKES ME WONDER WHO BENEFITTED FROM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. I sure did not.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


LGBTQ+
Diversity
Celebration
Veterans Affairs (VA)
Equality
