Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Nov 3, 2017
MAJ Montgomery Granger
102K
1.63K
529
318
318
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 239
1st Lt Vh Benedict
1
1
0
Isn’t it possible there are unknown circumstances...such as, Bergdahl May have covertly volunteered to (undercover) spy? Were that to be so, would he then qualify for extenuating circumstances in his sentencing?
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
I think if that were true he would have been offered a witness protection program. He still may, but we won't know about it. Obama sure treated him like the conquering hero, or prodigal son. Completely unwarranted. I think he could have been a heroin addict and was playing both sides. Probably never know that, either! Hooah!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Bryan O'Reilly
1
1
0
"Be, all that you can be-, Manning, Bergdahl. As you were, buttknuckles!- Keep on reaching, keep on growing .."
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Richard J Jones
1
1
0
It's beyond sad that the brass in charge doesn't see it your way, Major. I do. I think 14 years is too little time for all the misery this "goldbrick/coward" caused many decent, stalwart comrades-in-arms.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Don't do the crime if you can't pay the time.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Flor Gomez
1
1
0
Well I'm in complete disbelief sure gives new goals for the ARMY to persue now and work double time to "UNF***" the damage this judge has caused by not having the courage to do what needed to be done. Starting with Firing his ASS!!! Everyone is held to standard, EVERYONE!...including him.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Grant Skiles
1
1
0
If I can use one word...DISGRACEFUL. The whole military and all of its values and beliefs were just stepped on and thrown to the wind. The Judge in this case needs to step down. Hr needs to have a BAD fir report on his next report. I also would recommend that both men have to spend one hour a day with the one soldier who is paralyzed for the rest of his life for the rest of their lives. They can help his wife feed, wash, cloth and just talk to him giving her a couple hours each day to TRY to relax. Now his lawyer is asking for back pay. I say no to him but award this money to the families that had soldiers die or were hurt. this would be much needed money for financial bills. Nothing will ever bring them back nor make him walk again.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hasbun
1
1
0
We're already seeing ripples from this. A mitigating factor in the lack of jail time for Berghdal was undue influence as a result of comments made by the POTUS. Now, less than a week later, we have another case (I'm sure a lot of you remember this case) being overturned for undue influence as well.. I suspect this is going to become a recurring theme if lessons aren't learned quickly...

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/11/09/court-overturns-conviction-of-marine-urinated-taliban-corpses.html
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Exactly what undue influence can be attributed to the current POTUS regarding Bergdahl? Who said it was a “mitigating factor” in his sentence? In fact the former POTUS traded five Taliban leaders for Bergdahl, praised him as being honorable in his actions and hosted his Arabic-speaking father and ogled his mother in the Rose Garden of the White House. Was that undue influence noted and considered by the judge in sentencing?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - The judge who presided over Bergdahls sentencing specifically listed comments by Trump as factors in mitigation. As a general rule, it's not going to go well when your President declares you a traitor who deserves death prior to a guilty verdict.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
The judge never used the word "mitigation," which means "less severe." He said he felt that despite Trump's comments as a candidate he felt Bergdahl could receive fair sentencing. He also only said he would keep Trump's comments in mind as he weighs other factors affecting his sentencing decision. Fine details that actually pale in comparison to how he avoided mentioning the words of a sitting president claiming Bergdahl had served "honorably," when he knew in fact that he did not, or for releasing five ENEMY LEADERS in exchange for an admitted low ranking deserter, and parading Bergdahl's parents around in a completely embarrassing Rose Garden exhibition, complete with the father praising Allah in Arabic, and the President fawning over Bergdahl's mother. For THAT there should be a MORE severe sentence if the judge considered Trump's comments as a CANDIDATE.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt William Curtis
1
1
0
e is a coward, and deserted his post in wartime, and should be executed by firing squad
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PVT Iven Clark Jr.
1
1
0
Desertion during deployment should have landed Bergdahl in the grave. What he got wasn't even a slap on the wrist.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Vik Polivka
1
1
0
Given the core values of the Army, the fact that we are all human, and that he was a Private who messed up...yeah, they do that...I think he's suffered enough due to his mistake. Also, the Dishonorable Discharge counts as a felony, so he's got that to deal with.

Blaming him for insurgents killing/injuring U.S. Soldiers? No, I'd blame the insurgents. As our enemy there isn't any real surprise. It's a war.

With senior officers raping subordinates, having affairs while overseas, and using tax payers money to pay for it, etc...beating a dead horse, about a Private screwing up, is overkill.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
SGT Bergdahl chose to leave his unit in time of war. That is grounds for a field execution. What happened to him after he left was a direct result of his desertion, and should have no bearing on his punishment. He suffered? Too damn bad. He was lucky to be alive. Disloyalty is the absolute worst crime one can commit because it can lead to ripples of injury to the force, as took place. If Bergdahl were the only one hurt he would have gotten what he deserved, but he wasn't the only one hurt. He had a mission and failed in that mission by choice. I absolutely blame him for every single adverse thing that happened to anyone, because he deserted. How you can think otherwise is bizarre. The other issues you list have absolutely nothing to do with Bergdahl or his case. Apples and oranges, SSG.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Vik Polivka
SSG Vik Polivka
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - The other issues are to show that most of the time, things aren't taken to the extreme. Picking, and choosing when something will be given the most severe punishment possible isn't justice. Military, or otherwise. If every single instance of military crime resulted in max punishment, if every service member who could be executed was given that sentence, I'd have zero issue with it. Also, having such high standards for a Private, but being lenient on leaders who know better, and are expected to live up to a higher standard is hypocrisy. Sure, he's wrong. He's surrounded by better Soldiers, and better people. In the last decade alone, there wasn't an execution for rape, improper hazarding of a vessel, misbehavior of a sentinel or lookout...such as the people who allowed him to go AWOL, right? Since 1916 the Army has executed 135 ( (Source: National Law Journal, 4/5/99) people. There are a ton of cases that have had the option to execute the guilty party, but have not. Check out this high speed LTC who only got 3 years for rape, among other things, https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/06/14/air-force-officer-convicted-sentenced-to-3-years-for-rape-and-other-charges/

3 years? Rape, mishandling classified information, etc...but the Private is who we need to come down on, right? This is just recent news, not even the Sinclair shenanigans, etc. Not apples, and oranges at all, MAJ.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
SSG Vik Polivka - I respectfully disagree. You make a case for . . . what, homogenization? Each case, judged on its merits, deserves a unique punishment that should fit the crime. Mixed in there somehow, some way, is the idea that however the case is adjudicated, there must be one eye on the potential ramifications of the outcome. We are a country of laws because we wish to dispassionately order our society. We allow a philosophy of rather letting a guilty man go free than imprison an innocent man, so leniency is part of the fabric of our judicial outcomes. That's a given. What's not a given is how each individual judge views the world, their place in it, and a moral and ethical culture that values victim hood as much as it loathes criminality. Take the 730 released detainees from Gitmo. The liberal left and MSM value their victim hood more than they loathe their criminality. In fact, none of those who sympathize with Islamists even mention 9/11 nor the sacrifices of the U.S. military in helping to keep us all safe. They too, are the enemy. It seems as though SGT Bergdahl enjoyed the sympathy of the judge. Apparently, the judge forgot the dispassionate side of his job. The judge also abdicated his responsibility to consider the future ramifications of his decision to free Bergdahl sans any further real punishment. The judge had an opportunity to send a message to future deserters that not only are they at risk from the enemy, but also at risk for severe consequences of their actions. IMO the judge devalued military justice and discounted the Army Values for generations to come.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Vik Polivka
SSG Vik Polivka
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - Good morning, and happy TGIF! Given that one person has been executed for desertion, Edward Slovik, the judge followed jurisprudence in the matter. Rape, and/or murder is what the military is most likely to punish with the death sentence.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Michael Scott
1
1
0
After all of the crap this country has gone through for this guy, and the 8 year long journey of crap, this waste of human flesh must be in prison. My heart goes out to the search teams of the two heroes who were injured in the search for this coward. Most of all, America does not negotiate with terroists. Therefore, Obama needs to be in jail too!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close