Posted on Nov 3, 2017
The Bergdahl Sentencing and the Precedent it Sets
102K
1.63K
529
318
318
0
The US Army Values are Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity and Personal Courage.
Former Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl apparently forgot these when, on June 30, 2009, he deserted his unit in Afghanistan, where he wanted to, in his words, “make the world a better place.” Former SGT Bergdahl also forgot that he was wearing the uniform of the United States Army, and that armies fight wars. He signed up. No one forced him into service, and no one forced him to continue service if at any point he decided he had had enough.
In the Army there are legitimate avenues of redress of grievances, and now more than ever before. Your chain of command, the Chaplain, a JAG (Judge Advocate General) officer, or even the highest commander above where you think your problem lies. SGT Bergdahl had whipped himself into an almost psychotic state of isolation, from his unit, from his battle-buddies and even from himself. In the end, the enemy seemed more desirable than the mess he had made in his foxhole.
The sentencing of SGT (now PV-1) Bergdahl is now complete. Instead of a 14 year sentence, sought by the prosecution, a sentence of time served, a reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay and a dishonorable discharge will have to do.
Although Bergdahl had plead guilty to desertion and misconduct before the enemy, the circumstances under which SGT Bergdahl was released, the trade of five Taliban leaders notwithstanding, has its own implications of treason. Some have said that Bergdahl has suffered enough, including his defense team. Some say he is not fit to live, let alone wear the uniform. Several witnesses have testified about their war injuries and losses they claim happened because of Bergdahl’s desertion. There were rumors but no evidence that SGT Bergdahl had given the enemy critical information about the unit, its operations and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). This would allow the enemy to anticipate the unit’s movements and tendencies, potentially deadly information. Some say, while searching for SGT Bergdahl, they were hit and men died. One man, a former Navy SEAL, claimed tearfully that his service dog was killed on one such mission, and others suffered crippling and career ending injuries. All of this was supposedly taken into consideration before the sentence was handed down by the military judge, Col. Jeffery Nance.
In my opinion, all this testimony is over-engineering. It’s all good, but shouldn’t be necessary to complete the project. Bergdahl deserted in a time of war. How do you maintain good order and discipline if you allow folks to just walk away? There is no claim of insanity. There is no plea bargain. There is no excuse. The punishment for desertion can be death.The reason for this goes back to the beginning of human conflict. If you run in the face of the enemy, you have abdicated your responsibility as a member of the group to help keep the group safe.
In our own Revolutionary War and subsequent conflicts, such as the Civil War, it wasn’t so much power and punch that won the day as it was which side would run first. Name a war or conflict, and what wins the day more times than not is the will to win or survive. Fight or flight. This is why the American Army is so effective; we are trained that in war the mission comes first. We are trained to never leave a soldier behind. We are trained to be good teammates. We are trained to care for each other, help each other and protect each other. And in the foxhole, when the bullets are flying, it’s about you and your battle-buddy, fighting for your lives.The bigger picture is that you are defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, part of the oath of enlistment that Bergdahl breached. But if you allow soldiers to run and then suffer inadequate consequences, what are you telling everyone else who swore that same oath? What then does it mean? In our politically correct, social media, “If it feels good, do it” society, oaths and promises seem blasé and passé. In fact, they are our lifeblood. If we let one instance of obvious and blatant desertion slip through the cracks, what then do we do with the next one, or the next? Kneeling for the national anthem and the absence of even one American flag on the opening night of a national political convention are not simply warning signs, they are signs of the apocalypse that feed the idea that Bergdahl did nothing wrong. That he is innocent of desertion because he was oppressed and that somehow his actions were free speech. It’s not about any of that. It’s about loyalty. The number one most important Army value, and value in life. The acronym constructed out of the Army Values is LDRSHIP (Leadership). The Army aspires to train every soldier to be a leader. In the American Army, even E-Private Zero, Snuffy Smith is expected to carry out the mission if all the leaders above him are incapacitated, in the spirit of Audie Murphy. Murphy, the highly decorated farm boy turned hero from WWII who was battlefield promoted from sergeant to second lieutenant and saved many lives with his heroism, over, and over again, all at 5’4” and 112 pounds, carried on with the mission, time and again. We owe it to the memory of all those who gave their lives in defense of this great nation. We owe it to those who were injured and may have died while searching for Bowe Bergdahl, and we owe it to the future of this nation that Bowe Bergdahl’s punishment fit the crime. But the punishment in this case has not fit the crime in any way, shape or form. The echo from this proceeding will carry far and wide, that the perceived suffering of one man, a deserter, held more weight than the entire history of the military of the greatest nation on earth.
Former Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl apparently forgot these when, on June 30, 2009, he deserted his unit in Afghanistan, where he wanted to, in his words, “make the world a better place.” Former SGT Bergdahl also forgot that he was wearing the uniform of the United States Army, and that armies fight wars. He signed up. No one forced him into service, and no one forced him to continue service if at any point he decided he had had enough.
In the Army there are legitimate avenues of redress of grievances, and now more than ever before. Your chain of command, the Chaplain, a JAG (Judge Advocate General) officer, or even the highest commander above where you think your problem lies. SGT Bergdahl had whipped himself into an almost psychotic state of isolation, from his unit, from his battle-buddies and even from himself. In the end, the enemy seemed more desirable than the mess he had made in his foxhole.
The sentencing of SGT (now PV-1) Bergdahl is now complete. Instead of a 14 year sentence, sought by the prosecution, a sentence of time served, a reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay and a dishonorable discharge will have to do.
Although Bergdahl had plead guilty to desertion and misconduct before the enemy, the circumstances under which SGT Bergdahl was released, the trade of five Taliban leaders notwithstanding, has its own implications of treason. Some have said that Bergdahl has suffered enough, including his defense team. Some say he is not fit to live, let alone wear the uniform. Several witnesses have testified about their war injuries and losses they claim happened because of Bergdahl’s desertion. There were rumors but no evidence that SGT Bergdahl had given the enemy critical information about the unit, its operations and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). This would allow the enemy to anticipate the unit’s movements and tendencies, potentially deadly information. Some say, while searching for SGT Bergdahl, they were hit and men died. One man, a former Navy SEAL, claimed tearfully that his service dog was killed on one such mission, and others suffered crippling and career ending injuries. All of this was supposedly taken into consideration before the sentence was handed down by the military judge, Col. Jeffery Nance.
In my opinion, all this testimony is over-engineering. It’s all good, but shouldn’t be necessary to complete the project. Bergdahl deserted in a time of war. How do you maintain good order and discipline if you allow folks to just walk away? There is no claim of insanity. There is no plea bargain. There is no excuse. The punishment for desertion can be death.The reason for this goes back to the beginning of human conflict. If you run in the face of the enemy, you have abdicated your responsibility as a member of the group to help keep the group safe.
In our own Revolutionary War and subsequent conflicts, such as the Civil War, it wasn’t so much power and punch that won the day as it was which side would run first. Name a war or conflict, and what wins the day more times than not is the will to win or survive. Fight or flight. This is why the American Army is so effective; we are trained that in war the mission comes first. We are trained to never leave a soldier behind. We are trained to be good teammates. We are trained to care for each other, help each other and protect each other. And in the foxhole, when the bullets are flying, it’s about you and your battle-buddy, fighting for your lives.The bigger picture is that you are defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, part of the oath of enlistment that Bergdahl breached. But if you allow soldiers to run and then suffer inadequate consequences, what are you telling everyone else who swore that same oath? What then does it mean? In our politically correct, social media, “If it feels good, do it” society, oaths and promises seem blasé and passé. In fact, they are our lifeblood. If we let one instance of obvious and blatant desertion slip through the cracks, what then do we do with the next one, or the next? Kneeling for the national anthem and the absence of even one American flag on the opening night of a national political convention are not simply warning signs, they are signs of the apocalypse that feed the idea that Bergdahl did nothing wrong. That he is innocent of desertion because he was oppressed and that somehow his actions were free speech. It’s not about any of that. It’s about loyalty. The number one most important Army value, and value in life. The acronym constructed out of the Army Values is LDRSHIP (Leadership). The Army aspires to train every soldier to be a leader. In the American Army, even E-Private Zero, Snuffy Smith is expected to carry out the mission if all the leaders above him are incapacitated, in the spirit of Audie Murphy. Murphy, the highly decorated farm boy turned hero from WWII who was battlefield promoted from sergeant to second lieutenant and saved many lives with his heroism, over, and over again, all at 5’4” and 112 pounds, carried on with the mission, time and again. We owe it to the memory of all those who gave their lives in defense of this great nation. We owe it to those who were injured and may have died while searching for Bowe Bergdahl, and we owe it to the future of this nation that Bowe Bergdahl’s punishment fit the crime. But the punishment in this case has not fit the crime in any way, shape or form. The echo from this proceeding will carry far and wide, that the perceived suffering of one man, a deserter, held more weight than the entire history of the military of the greatest nation on earth.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 239
I agree brother! Bergdahl would have been in front of a firing squad when desertion to the enemy was considered a bad choice.
(2)
(0)
Life in prison for Pvt Bergdal; 100 lashes in public for the dumb asses who approved swapping 5 Taliban for a deserter.
(2)
(0)
MAJ John Douglas
Firing squad is more appropriate. Going over to the enemy in wartime is a capitol offense.
(0)
(0)
it is with great sorrow that I read this news. This marks the beginning of the end in the military discipline. it is only expected that in the near future more and more " soldiers " use their free speech when they desert their post simply because they don't like the way the army functions. it is such a shame to observe and live through times like this. I lost several soldiers and friends while in the service, and not once did I ever witness such cowardice in the face of the enemy. I am so sad to see this happening... DUTY, HONOR, COUNTRY.
(2)
(0)
I saw this coming with the POTUS that was in charge and the officers enjoined to bring the rule of law with military justice. Putting it bluntly it makes me sick think that this person was promoted to SGT without the proper training of development of progressive training and experience. In my thoughts he was a deserter based on the investigation. This in itself sets an out for future soldiers that took the oath to have an out if they want to unass the AO.
(2)
(0)
Since someone resurrected this old thread;
A very good read on the subjection of desertion:
"The Deserters: A Hidden History of World War II"
Book by Charles Glass
A very good read on the subjection of desertion:
"The Deserters: A Hidden History of World War II"
Book by Charles Glass
(2)
(0)
Does this verdict mean, if I don't like my discharge, I can get it changed to something better?
(2)
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
Apparently. And you probably never even plead guilty to desertion and misbehavior before the enemy.
(1)
(0)
WAIT ,,,,, "NOT MY SERGEANT" I do not believe in this automatic promotion for a someone that deserted his post.
(2)
(0)
MAJ Granger is spot on in all aspects of his adroit analysis. There were options available to POTUS obama to get the traitor back into US forces hands, yet he chose to give up HVTs "in exchange". Why?
The duty/purpose of UCMJ is for the order and discipline of the armed forces. It has been carefully constructed to meet all requirements of justice under the constant cloud of operations in war. The sentence of the traitor obviates its purpose. It isn't the first time during GWOT that the pentagon generals have sided with the desires of the politicos.
On our side, our (US Army) Special Forces Groups could not shoot sentries without sending them a Hallmark invitation according to our ROI (that was directly from POTUS obama.).
The duty/purpose of UCMJ is for the order and discipline of the armed forces. It has been carefully constructed to meet all requirements of justice under the constant cloud of operations in war. The sentence of the traitor obviates its purpose. It isn't the first time during GWOT that the pentagon generals have sided with the desires of the politicos.
On our side, our (US Army) Special Forces Groups could not shoot sentries without sending them a Hallmark invitation according to our ROI (that was directly from POTUS obama.).
(2)
(0)
In the FBI I was taught to connect the dots! The New Democrats! It hurts me to call someone a Democrat new or old when I was an Old Democrat for about 40yr's! Although as I hear that Joe Biden (actually watch a Video of him giving a speech this last weekend) where he calls ANYONE THAT DISAGREES WITH HIM DIRT/FILTH! I would not want anything to do with that group! Then the old Sec. of State Hillary Clinton suggesting that we need to SCRAP the CONSTITUTION creates great concern! All the things that Democrats are doing are all one Brick Short of a Load! Sad!
(2)
(0)
Under UCMJ Bergdahl should have gotten the death penalty. Dis
Under UCMJ Bergdahl should have gotten the death penalty! Injuries or death of fellow soldiers in the attempt of rescue of a deserter warrants the death penalty not a slap on the wrist. The judge should be relieved of duty!
Under UCMJ Bergdahl should have gotten the death penalty! Injuries or death of fellow soldiers in the attempt of rescue of a deserter warrants the death penalty not a slap on the wrist. The judge should be relieved of duty!
(2)
(0)
SP5 Michael Cates
I agree! XPres. Obama handled Bergdahl about as poorly as that of our Ambassador that was murdered! Then you add Iran! Wow! I have always been religious telling friends that I go to church off and on but I carry my Religion with me every day every were just as I did when I was serving in Vietnam!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next