Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Nov 3, 2017
MAJ Montgomery Granger
112K
1.55K
506
317
317
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 237
MSgt Michael Madden
1
1
0
He deserted his post. He should have been sent to Leavenworth for a 10 years or so. So many men got killed searching for him.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG David Forler
1
1
0
Hell, no Court Marshall CAN EVER AGAIN HAVE A DESERTION TRIAL. All deserters are free to go. Dollar to a donut these FUELD GRADE OFFICERS ARE OBAMA EDUCATED NO INTEGRITY OFFICERS
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Ron Salsbury
1
1
0
I you have not been following this lately, the new twist to this horseshit story coming out now, is he will be hailed as the turning point for bringing about the closure of this long 18 years plus war on terror related to the exchange of the "Gitmo 5." The article states since releasing the group, it has allowed open dialog between Taliban officials and the US/Afghanistan Government to bring and end to hostilities. This could have been accomplished without him being surrendered period, it just adds to another slap in the face to those who serve honorably and stains the memories of those brothers and sisters we have lost. America has to wake up; next thing you know he will become the second pardoned felon to serve as President of the United States, right next to Draft Dodger Bill Clinton.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Ron Salsbury
1
1
0
Most Deserters get the death penalty, but rarely do we see it followed through by the service, because of the Cry Baby Bed Wetter Lib-Tards screaming about peoples rights. Any person who deserts their post deserves this punishment, because it puts the personnel of their Unit at risk. Since this penalty does not get carried out, I would love to see an alternative applied; my suggestion is the Mark of Cain to the fore head that cannot be altered, so everyone in the free world will know they are cowards leaving good men and women of the services to fight in their absence. Let society shame them for life, a fate harsher for these individuals more suited than death; that punishment is to easy for them, and more than they deserve.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Jeff Blovat
1
1
0
Amen on the above.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Bernard Bates
1
1
0
I believe the army sometimes recruits persons who are not qualified to be in any military service. the recruiter has a quota to fill so, so once this person is signed up they become someone else,s problem. If I had been in Bergdahl,s Plt. I would have been mad as hell. Everything said and done the Army should have been on trial. In 1966 My buddie was a Marine Recuiter. His Quota was six persons a month. He knew every judge in four counties. The Judge would give the person arrested their choice , join the Marine corp or go to Jail. My buddie would go to the Jail Handcuff the prisoner and take him to the Federal bldg. The Marine Corp had to take draftee,s back then. It ruined the corp for several years. They would not let a draftee reenlist. I just hope we can get enough personel volunteering instead of persons who don't want to be their. Semper Fi.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Ronald Rogers
1
1
0
AGREE!!!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt J D McKee
1
1
0
Reference the above picture---The one good thing that happened around the time of this whole sorry mess is that our military people no longer have to associate with such abhorrent scum. Just look at that traitorous piece of shit standing next to what I take to be Bergdahl's proud mama. And Berghdal is a traitor, too.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joseph McCausland
1
1
0
Really, after the sideshow the Obama s put on for his parents in the Rose Garden, was there every any doubt that this deserting scumbag would never spend on day in Leavenworth....no the fix was in from the very beginning.
This is a black mark on the United States Army.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Jim Bemis
1
1
0
We do not know the evidence brought out at trial. Yes, Bergdahl brought most or all of his troubles on himself. There was claim that he was trying to reach a higher headquarters command post when he left. While you may find it bs, there is no way to know how much credence the judge may have given the claim. The other charge, misbehavior before the enemy, could be interpreted as any number of things, not all of them about running away. Depending upon what the misbehavior was perceived to be could have had an effect. Lastly, there was no evidence that his capture by the Taliban was anything other than unfortuitous. If there was no proof or admission that he gave crucial information to the enemy, there would only be the 5 years he spent in Taliban hands, with some evidence that it was a rather unpleasant experience. I realize that for many of us that does not balance for those lost or injured trying to find him, etc. Apparently, it may have had some effect on the military judge. While even I would admit that the sentence was on the extreme end of the scale, it was within the reasonable realm of possibility, even if you severely disagree with it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
7 y
Respectfully, I think what's reasonable is that the enemy extracted from Bergdahl whatever they wanted to know from him, and that that information lead to the injury, death or at least redirection of assets and resources during a life or death military operation. Of all the Army values, LOYALTY is the most important. Misbehavior before the enemy could have been the more serious charge, overshadowed by the fact that the Obama administration went to great lengths and pains to say Bergdahl had served honorably, even though they knew quite well he had not. The power and influence of a sitting President weighs heavily on any possible punishment. The Commander in Chief traded Bergdahl for five Taliban leaders. How could Bergdahl therefore ever receive a fair adjudication? The judge's BOSS said the guy is good, and traded really important bad guys for him, for SOME reason. The guy wasn't lost in the woods. He wasn't captured by the enemy during a fire fight. He didn't eject from a plane of enemy territory, he CHOSE to leave his post. He willfully IGNORED his duty of loyalty. If it were YOUR Army, Sir, how would YOU hope to maintain good order and discipline going forward with your troops, especially those with whom Bergdahl served? Look THEM in the eye and explain the verdict. Either that or re-write your values, ethics and morals.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Jim Bemis
Lt Col Jim Bemis
7 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger (1) I did just explain how the verdict could come out the way it did. (2) If you read my comment more closely, you would also realize I did not indicate that I approved the sentence. (3) If you have first hand information about the evidence adduced at trial (as opposed to your personal views alone), please feel free to share that information. It would help all of us better understand what happened, and why.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joseph McCausland
SFC Joseph McCausland
7 y
Our brave warriors are dead or injured looking for this "scumbag" and he is out walking free. May the universe gives back to him the hardships ten fold that his cowardly actions brought upon others.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close