Posted on May 28, 2016
Congress is targeting military housing stipends, and it could cost troops thousands
1.75K
6
3
4
4
0
Senate lawmakers want to radically overhaul how military housing stipends are awarded and end the practice of troops pocketing extra cash from the payouts.
The plan is tucked into the Senate’s pending draft of the annual defense authorization measure, and hasn’t received the same attention as major military health care and acquisition reforms also included in the legislation.
But it has the potential to change housing stipend totals for nearly every service member in coming years, with some potentially losing hundreds of dollars a month. And it comes after a series of pay and benefits trims in recent years that have left advocates frustrated about increased financial strain on military families.
House lawmakers did not include any housing stipend provisions in their draft of the annual authorization bill, approved earlier this month. Last year, in conference committee work, they stripped out a Senate provision limiting payouts given to dual military couples, favoring the current system for now.
Pentagon officials oppose the idea of rigidly connecting the stipend exactly to housing costs. They responded to the Senate proposal by saying housing allowance is “simply another form of compensation.”
In a report on housing allowances delivered to Congress in March, the Defense Department said it would be “inappropriate to limit a member’s compensation by tying that compensation to actual expenses.” They describe the move as a potential retention problem, and say it unfairly penalizes dual military families and troops with roommates.
“While potential savings could be achieved ... providing a degraded compensation package to one member, solely because of that member’s status of being married to another member, and co-location, stands in direct conflict with the principle that a member is paid regular military compensation in exchange for his or her service,” the report states.
Given the limited attention this has received thus far, it is unclear whether the Senate proposal is aimed enacting changes now or using the congressional negotiation process to launch a more thorough re-examination in years to come.
Along with the dramatic changes, the Senate legislation includes a new report from the Pentagon, due next March, detailing not only how to implement a new system but also to look at “the impact of these changes on retention and overall military compensation.”
Last year, in its report to Congress, the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission argued BAH should not be dramatically altered, saying it “strikes an appropriate compromise between representing compensation to service members and assistance for their living expenses.”
Lawmakers have already targeted both military pay and housing allowances as sources of defense savings in recent years. BAH rates are scheduled to drop to 97 percent of expected area housing costs in 2017, and the proposed Senate pay raise for troops next year is below private sector wage estimates for the fourth year in a row.
If it becomes law, the new housing allowance payouts would not go into effect until January 2018, giving military officials at least a year to implement and explain the new system.
The plan is tucked into the Senate’s pending draft of the annual defense authorization measure, and hasn’t received the same attention as major military health care and acquisition reforms also included in the legislation.
But it has the potential to change housing stipend totals for nearly every service member in coming years, with some potentially losing hundreds of dollars a month. And it comes after a series of pay and benefits trims in recent years that have left advocates frustrated about increased financial strain on military families.
House lawmakers did not include any housing stipend provisions in their draft of the annual authorization bill, approved earlier this month. Last year, in conference committee work, they stripped out a Senate provision limiting payouts given to dual military couples, favoring the current system for now.
Pentagon officials oppose the idea of rigidly connecting the stipend exactly to housing costs. They responded to the Senate proposal by saying housing allowance is “simply another form of compensation.”
In a report on housing allowances delivered to Congress in March, the Defense Department said it would be “inappropriate to limit a member’s compensation by tying that compensation to actual expenses.” They describe the move as a potential retention problem, and say it unfairly penalizes dual military families and troops with roommates.
“While potential savings could be achieved ... providing a degraded compensation package to one member, solely because of that member’s status of being married to another member, and co-location, stands in direct conflict with the principle that a member is paid regular military compensation in exchange for his or her service,” the report states.
Given the limited attention this has received thus far, it is unclear whether the Senate proposal is aimed enacting changes now or using the congressional negotiation process to launch a more thorough re-examination in years to come.
Along with the dramatic changes, the Senate legislation includes a new report from the Pentagon, due next March, detailing not only how to implement a new system but also to look at “the impact of these changes on retention and overall military compensation.”
Last year, in its report to Congress, the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission argued BAH should not be dramatically altered, saying it “strikes an appropriate compromise between representing compensation to service members and assistance for their living expenses.”
Lawmakers have already targeted both military pay and housing allowances as sources of defense savings in recent years. BAH rates are scheduled to drop to 97 percent of expected area housing costs in 2017, and the proposed Senate pay raise for troops next year is below private sector wage estimates for the fourth year in a row.
If it becomes law, the new housing allowance payouts would not go into effect until January 2018, giving military officials at least a year to implement and explain the new system.
Congress is targeting military housing stipends, and it could cost troops thousands
Posted from airforcetimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Congress
Congress
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
Got to pay for that massive tax cut they gave everyone. Easy target silent minority.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
That is interesting but not unsurprising news that Senate lawmakers and their staff are looking into housing stipends SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL. The best solution would be to ensure that each housing stipend matches the expenses it was appropriated for. That is probably in the too-hard-to-do box so they are working on to manage and apportion the stipends and adjust as prices change.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
Not surprising at all, it's a benefit and they are always being reviewed and subject to cuts. I suspect that there may be more efficient ways to award and monitor housing allowances since the current system has been around for years. What bothers me is the perception in Congress that people are profiting from these benefits. This benefit has always been around to compensate for high cost of living in certain areas that people are stationed. There will always be assignments to these locations, so the need will exist. My fear is that any overhaul will use the same logic that was used to calculate recent COL allowances for everyone. "The cost of gasoline has gone down so there will be no or very small COL increases". This logic totally ignores the fact that the cost of, food, housing, goods, etc. have been constantly on the rise. If this is how an overhaul is conducted, bend over, here it comes!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google