Avatar feed
Responses: 16
SGT Jeremiah B.
8
8
0
I would be okay with an ART 15, but she may be refusing NJP. She also has given interviews defending her actions so her CoC may consider that an escalation deserving of more. She just doesn't seem to get that what she does in uniform is different from what she does as a private citizen.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Alan Bentson
8
8
0
Nonjudicial punishment, Article 15, may have been appropriate if it was a local violation and came before the company commander. After sailor put the video on the internet and came to the attention at a higher level, it is proper to prosecute under Article 92. I think it would be more appropriate to prosecute under Article 134, Disloyal statement. Maximum punishment under 134 is three years confinement. I have no idea what the actual punishment for this particular offense should be.
(8)
Comment
(0)
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
>1 y
Totally in agreement.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
Art. 92 is the more appropriate charge and is easy to prove.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Terry P.
6
6
0
Edited >1 y ago
MSgt Danny Hope There is difference between defending the Constitution and using it.We (military) all defend it,but by contract relinquish certain aspects of it.
Punishment is definitely justified in this case.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close