Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
1
1
0
Good stuff. Good luck to them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
1
1
0
Wouldn’t it be better to highlight those women that are successful, rather than how many try out for the big show.
(1)
Comment
(0)
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
5 y
MCPO Roger Collins exactly my point these first 2 enlisted are part of around a dozen women since the rule change in 2015. Good luck to them. Plenty of men dont make the cut so females not making the cut is expected. However, I fully expect some women to make the cut. I am also certain. When they do, there will be cries of favoritism and other such nonsense.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
5 y
1SG (Join to see) I am on the record saying females should compete for any position in the military, as long as consistent standards are maintained. But, you are doing them o favors by hiding a nearly 100% loss. The few don’t need accolades, if they have the same results as their male counterparts. Winning one of these prestigious positions and assigned is enough, IMO.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
5 y
MCPO Roger Collins when they stop highlighting men and dogs for their accomplishments I expect they will stop highlighting women for theirs. Are you saying accomplishments all around are not deserving of mention?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
5 y
1SG (Join to see) If that’s what you inferred from my posts, it’s a problem on your end.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Jack Cardwell
1
1
0
Thanks for sharing.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close