Posted on Dec 12, 2016
Bipartisan Electors Ask James Clapper: Release Facts on Outside Interference in U.S. Election
7.23K
14
12
3
3
0
now some Electors are requesting Intelligence Info. Whew- did not see that coming.
Bipartisan Electors Ask James Clapper: Release Facts on Outside Interference in U.S. Election
Posted from medium.comPosted in these groups: 
Election 2016
Elections
Hillary Clinton
Donald Trump
Office of the President (POTUS)
Election 2016 Elections Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
Suspended Profile
SGT (Join to see) - This the kind of story I would expect major media outlets to cover immediately - and yet there is no mention of it - so I wonder if the report is true or fake news. That said, the EC is positioned in the US Constitution to vote a week from now on December 18th confirming or reallocating the title of President Elect and Vice President Elect. To actually exercise their constitutional role is unprecedented, would be a gutsy move, but is completely and totally supported in the US Constitutional. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
show previous comments
PO3 Ricky Foster
most of the other story's Ive seen, so far, are using this story as their reference.
(0)
(0)
Suspended Profile
PO3 Ricky Foster - That is why I suspect this is fake news. It violates the fundamental intelligence principle of only relying on two independent sources unless the information is so sensitive and critical we must rely on one trusted source. But, if the election is invalid then the decision about what to do next would fall to the US Senate - which could confirm the results - or call for a new election which may change outcome. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
Suspended Profile
SGT (Join to see) - Fox News is covering this story now. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
1LT (Join to see)
If anything other than what is expected were to happen, I think we would have a Civil War on our hands. I hope they do the right thing and pay the person that the people elected under the current rules. As much as I would not like to see Donald Trump in the White House, he won. For the sake of the country, we should move forward.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Why. Not to quote Clinton, but what difference does it make? What was released was pretty bad. I don't condone how it was collected and released but that's a separate issue. If I rob a house and discover/release to the cops that the owner is running a kidde porn site, do we focus only on who robbed the house?
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
The only interference the Russians are accused of is HRC's email's. So exposing truth is deemed interference then we are fvck'd. If the EC fails to elect Trump all hell is going to break loose, is that what they really want, maybe? They are putting more effort on Trump than they ever did on HRC, so sick of this.
(1)
(0)
Suspended Profile
PO3 Ricky Foster - I wouldn't speculate on who the EC would choose to replace the PE and VPE - could easily be a couple of leading republicans. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
PO3 Ricky Foster
If I remember right if a EC is faithless it goes to that states house to decide. So even if the EC goes crazy, they still do not have final say.=
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google