Avatar feed
Responses: 8
PO3 Ricky Foster
3
3
0
That is alot of money. I'm not really going to comment on any "rights or wrongs" because it would be an uneducated opinion.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Maj Marty Hogan
Maj Marty Hogan
>1 y
PO3 Ricky Foster I don't think it is right vs wrong; I file it into let me have the same option. More tax deferred- no cap etc. I would have set up my life on one income and saved my wife's entire income every year. That entails not spending more than you make etc, but we click like that any way.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT AH-64 Attack Helicopter Repairer
3
3
0
good stuff... I could use 10% of that monthly... lol i have some ground to make up for the future lol
(3)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Kelli Mays
Sgt Kelli Mays
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) yeah, me too.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
1
1
0
The key seems to be that these 100 CEOs invested very well and their retirement funds have grown to be significant Maj Marty Hogan. I don't begrudge people for doing well in their investments and leveraging company matching funds which many salaried people do.
"The nest eggs of those chief executives are large enough to generate an average $253,088 in monthly retirement payments for the rest of their lives, the report said. The 100 CEOs studied have retirement funds equal to the entire retirement savings of 44% of white working class households, 59% of African-American families, 75% of Latino families and 44% of female-headed households, the Institute found."
MSN is more socialist in their outlook, which is why they compare the retirement of 100 people to percentages of groups of people.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close