Posted on Sep 22, 2022
Larry Kudlow: Another series of utterly irresponsible and unserious statements by the far-left...
811
62
14
11
11
0
Edited 2 y ago
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 3
LTC (Join to see)
Rhwnks, the bankers really put these two female dog Congress women into the woodshed and put them in their place. Their head is so big they think they can push Bankers around and bankers are very comfortable right now with interest rates going up. And they will continue to fund fossil fuel projects.
CSM Charles Hayden
CSM Charles Hayden
(3)
(0)
LTC (Join to see) Today I saw a newspaper article stating that Democrat state Attorney Generals were chastising Republican states for not investing retirement funds in ESG stocks. ESG stocks have underperformed the market for several years!
(7)
(0)
(6)
(0)
Sgt (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - Hahahaha meme of Pres Trump and Jones modes of transport — same w running the country.
(2)
(0)
If banks still make mortgages for beach or lake-front property any longer than them terminating - paid in Full- by 2035 then no longer making mortgages or backing the building of such rexidences/ hotels/ service industries, then there is NO global Warming. How many of any of us think major banks and even small banks would give 30 year / 40 year mortgages and fund building houses/ other structures on waterfront property knowing the properties would be underwater in any measure thus negating the profit the bank makes in funding such.
Especially the insurance companies would not give policies to any homeowner/ business for even the exterior structures, let alone the inside damage flooded out homes being destroyed would have on the financial markets/ future continuity of those banks and loan companies to exist...
Then there's the utilities who would at the very least balk at the notion of impending damage due to continual flooding and the shortages / disruption of flow of services due to imminent and permanent flooding would have upon the investiture of equipment/ lines/ pipework/ telephone poles/ substations, water treatment facilities, and everything else these utility companies would invest in building, when they know the area will under continual flooding and be useless for anything other than to fish or boat on for the rest of Time??? And the banks would NOT lend any financial aid to the utility companies to put equipment and service to an area that will be UNDER water very soon and forever??
Just look at the investment needed ! Would you buy land to build on if it will shortly be underwater???
Neither would a bank/ loan company.
Especially the insurance companies would not give policies to any homeowner/ business for even the exterior structures, let alone the inside damage flooded out homes being destroyed would have on the financial markets/ future continuity of those banks and loan companies to exist...
Then there's the utilities who would at the very least balk at the notion of impending damage due to continual flooding and the shortages / disruption of flow of services due to imminent and permanent flooding would have upon the investiture of equipment/ lines/ pipework/ telephone poles/ substations, water treatment facilities, and everything else these utility companies would invest in building, when they know the area will under continual flooding and be useless for anything other than to fish or boat on for the rest of Time??? And the banks would NOT lend any financial aid to the utility companies to put equipment and service to an area that will be UNDER water very soon and forever??
Just look at the investment needed ! Would you buy land to build on if it will shortly be underwater???
Neither would a bank/ loan company.
(5)
(0)
Amn Dale Preisach
LTC (Join to see) i'm no adjuster. I just lived in a coastal community for 23 years and saw how hurricanes and flooding- both temporary but cyclical- affected the price of flood insurance / water damage for a " just in case scenario" .
Let alone if the insurance companies would even write a policy on any property soon to be LITERALLY underwater in short order and remain that way.
That's a sucker's bet.
Would you write a policy that covered a property soon to be demolished , knowing that it won't be available to market ever again??
You'd be put in hospital under observation.
Your Employer would void instantly/ deny the policy from being activated/ active if somehow it got to their desk without rejection outright.
You would not have a job at all if you wrote a policy on a property - soon to be flooded permanently just " in case it floods " !!?!???!!
Let alone if the insurance companies would even write a policy on any property soon to be LITERALLY underwater in short order and remain that way.
That's a sucker's bet.
Would you write a policy that covered a property soon to be demolished , knowing that it won't be available to market ever again??
You'd be put in hospital under observation.
Your Employer would void instantly/ deny the policy from being activated/ active if somehow it got to their desk without rejection outright.
You would not have a job at all if you wrote a policy on a property - soon to be flooded permanently just " in case it floods " !!?!???!!
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Amn Dale Preisach I'm sorry that you had to see this happen to you or possibly others but thank you for the wisdom you've been giving us. My comment wasn't being sarcastic to you, I just started hearing information that sounds familiar to me.
(3)
(0)
Amn Dale Preisach
LTC (Join to see) sorry , even when speaking to people i sometimes don't pick up on sarcasm.
On line it can be difficult for me.
On line it can be difficult for me.
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Amn Dale Preisach I was not sarcastic but I wanted you to not think I was being unfair.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next