Flynn resignation: Fox, Breitbart focus on leaks

They're not unconcerned. Investigations are taking place and have been for some time. Thus far, Flynn has not been found doing anything illegal. The problem is, it is HIGHLY illegal to leak this information and the means used to collect it. There is a mole, not a whistle blower and these leaks absolutely need to stop. If it continues, the American people will lose faith in our intelligence agencies, along with our government.

Here's how it works:

When Russian hackers steal and leak secrets from the DNC we need to focus not on the specter of a foreign (and historically adversarial) nation interfering with our elections but should instead focus on the content of those leaks.

But when journalists uncover evidence of potential (probable) violations of law by _Republican_ (that is key here) government officials we don't focus on the content of the content or the evidence we instead need to concern ourselves with how the journalists got that evidence.

Does it make sense now?

I am on the record as saying LTG Flynn was wrong. However, once again the progressive/democrat outrage machine really shouldn't be throwing stones at glass houses.

From Michael Ledeen, PJ Media, August 2014

"The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign."

Was this okay as well? Where was the progressive/democrat outrage when it was revealed a former ambassador was doing this before an election? Or did it just get thrown by the wayside because, gasp, Number 44 could do anything because he was the smartest, bestest guy ever to occupy the White House?