What military recruiters aren't telling women: You'll face disproportionate health risks

A MUST READ: As someone who has helped raise young girls who became strong independent women, I think that we need to re-examine pushing women into close combat roles. At what price are we as a society willing to pay for the progressive liberal and radical feminist agenda? If women are to be direct combat roles, are having quotas the way to go?

Also, wouldn't we rather have our volunteers making their choice on all the information? Things like, for those women who do serve in the Infantry or combat Marines, there will be personal medical and health consequences which they and we as a society and culture will have to pay. A “pull quote from this opinion piece:

"Many....won’t be obvious until years later. Just ask Marine Capt. Katie Petronio, who wrote in the Marine Corps Gazette of muscle atrophy, endurance problems, weight loss and infertility she considers the results of two combat deployments. 'Women have proved themselves in combat,' Petronio said, 'but in the most physically demanding roles, can they endure and are we willing to accept the attrition and medical issues that go along with integration?'”

While they did not come out and say it, the basic difference in men and women will necessitate either mean the services will have to lower the physical standards for the combat troops or the development of a two tier system of standards. Both of which will make even more difficult building unit cohesion and combat readiness. CPT Aaron Kletzing 1LT Sandy Annala COL Tom Lewis
COL (Join to see) @