Posted on Nov 9, 2017
U.S. Risks ‘Coup’ if Mueller Investigation Continues, Republicans Warn
3.2K
85
35
15
15
0
I agree, but it'll be hard to find someone who would be impartial as far as oversight is concerned. I do think Trump was dully elected. If the DNC can rig the election against Bernie Sanders, and illegal immigrants can vote because there's not a nationally required Voter ID law, how would Russian Interference be any different than what the DNC did or an illegal voting? I mean the Russians didn't force nearly 65,000,000 people to vote for Donald Trump. Russia didn't steal the election. Americans took their country back. PFC (Join to see) SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4" SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL Capt Gregory Prickett SSG (Join to see)
U.S. Risks ‘Coup’ if Mueller Investigation Continues, Republicans Warn
Posted from yahoo.com
United States
Investigation
Russia
Republicans
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
9
9
0
The problem is the Democratic party does not have the honesty and integrity that you posess, Cody. If you look to the right rear of Mueller on TV, you will see Eric Holder. That, in itself, tells me Mueller has to go!
(9)
(0)
6
6
0
Some folks believe any and every claim against an opposing party person, but disbelieve any and every claim against their preferred party person. . . It happened with President Obama, and it's happening with President Trump. Am I taking crazy pills, or am I really the only person who sees this silliness?
Some folks couldn't find objectivity if their life depended on it.
I only say this because it is painfully obvious folks are choosing to ignore information that goes against their beliefs, while happily accepting the same quality of information as evidence against those of opposing beliefs. Similar to discussions on religion, which is irrelevant to this topic.
People will latch onto FBI statements when it supports their cause, then disregard FBI statements when it's against their cause. Do they trust law enforcement or what? Why the cherry picking? When are these folks going to grow up to realize at some point we will have to leave the Fanboy politics behind, and start being objectivly thinking citizens who can make well rounded decisions based on fact alone, rather than their sensitive feelings?
Some folks couldn't find objectivity if their life depended on it.
I only say this because it is painfully obvious folks are choosing to ignore information that goes against their beliefs, while happily accepting the same quality of information as evidence against those of opposing beliefs. Similar to discussions on religion, which is irrelevant to this topic.
People will latch onto FBI statements when it supports their cause, then disregard FBI statements when it's against their cause. Do they trust law enforcement or what? Why the cherry picking? When are these folks going to grow up to realize at some point we will have to leave the Fanboy politics behind, and start being objectivly thinking citizens who can make well rounded decisions based on fact alone, rather than their sensitive feelings?
(6)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
SGT Anna Kleinschmidt - Investigation of what? Collusion? Let’s look at reality: there should be no investigation if there are no facts. When Mueller started there was no facts and even with the current charges there are no facts. It’s a witch hunt plain and simple when too many snowflakes were melting and the politicians “felt” they needed to do something. No collusion has been established to the President Trump campaign. Just for the sake of argument: say there was collusion established? What is the charge? How many years does one serve in jail after being found guilty of the charge of “collusion”? See what I mean. There’s no such thing.
That Mueller made his staff up primarily of Clinton supporters tells us he is only trying to fight a delaying tactic to protect himself and the Clintons, until they can try to elect more friends to protect themselves. There are some very hard facts against Former Secretary Clinton and Mueller when he was head of the FBI. Once these facts were reviled Mueller should have stepped down with his conflict of interest showing. An honorable person would have, this tells us who Mueller is.
That Mueller made his staff up primarily of Clinton supporters tells us he is only trying to fight a delaying tactic to protect himself and the Clintons, until they can try to elect more friends to protect themselves. There are some very hard facts against Former Secretary Clinton and Mueller when he was head of the FBI. Once these facts were reviled Mueller should have stepped down with his conflict of interest showing. An honorable person would have, this tells us who Mueller is.
(1)
(0)
SGT Anna Kleinschmidt
SFC (Join to see) Again we as the public are not given the information that they have but there has been plenty of smoke and the man had a very proven unsavory past that he has managed to intimidate or settle his way out of. Only a small percentage of Americans believe he is innocent at this point.
(0)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
SGT Anna Kleinschmidt - Respectively: When one can convict "smoke" in a court of law, come and talk to me. It appears you enjoy the "court of public opinion" too much.
(0)
(0)
SGT Anna Kleinschmidt
I SFC (Join to see) Well I believe there is real evidence against Trump, you believe it's a witch hunt. You believe their is real evidence against Hillary and I believe it's a witch hunt, we could be right or wrong but the country is divided on that issue with each side feeling as strongly as the other. Sadly that leaves us at an empass. We did not stop them from investigating Clinton so the same will hold for Trump.
(0)
(0)
6
6
0
The final vote count was approx. 65.8 million HRC to 63 million Trump for the record. Anything Mueller finds will have to stand up to great scrutiny and the rules of evidence. Our Constitution has provisions for almost any scenario that may arise from his investigation. Those involved with it are not intimidated by any threats regarding coups, revolutions, or anything else because the law is on their side. They have been duly appointed in accordance with the laws and policies that apply. Our longstanding civilian control over the military will support the Constitution if faced with that choice. Any leader that tries to exceed the boundaries afforded to him under the Constitution will be dealt with in accordance with it. Should we ever reach that point, it will be new territory, but our Nation will survive. Citizens, and especially former members of the military, will at that point will be faced with the choice of obeying the Constitution or any that choose to circumvent it. My several Oaths to the Constitution were for life. There were no Oaths to any political party or leader other than the President or officers appointed over me while I served.
https://transition.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2016/2016presgeresults.pdf
https://transition.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2016/2016presgeresults.pdf
|Å¡rò¶ÑÙýÏVEtr],ó|G,þG.äÓå9ÉÕËoE49ÏWjUDÏEôñþyRçuMsê·xlúýÕjsnqþøKQÞ?ÔLkýT4D§ü~Å.ªúädñts`QÓÎ9%éi/gÏß]óbÅ.ØÕbWßì"W(µ_NÎI4E=}p1bÓÆÉytVçr:ªîgãÑ.æYÊ Q]õbýac2qNQgÜÕtqWVÑU«Ò¿ËU=~È0XÛ|`q_s«"&ßÖèË5 9å=ÛwõÃêÆý$gI§qRxGY62$Á!rúøfÝg¡.éãA$dá@ØZøN!ìuäÈ4óÔòHNû"r'ËÀãü(^zÈOsè»åMOÜÎÇpNÈ?ËM ó)§à}í:w7 `ôØ"RëÞ.òÞZ(Èp)#.-NjB^÷,ðÀh]ûmàÚÈel`u]ïµÇvZÔdD]Â@i[@!yúÓôëaû8¡~izÇîkwÛ!Ü$mG㶠Bïª BG'ÙÝVÔ5'úeØUæEØué{Æ^ßtbÓ üÉÄZä@ðõv_g àéÒ8ç$ZàQæAß=M¡$4JcïØFèka»ïcùÔòNîûXxs.úb'...
(6)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google