Posted on Jan 23, 2018
evangelical-leaders-give-trump-a-mulligan-on-stormy-daniels
3.26K
57
43
8
8
0
The evangelicals wanted to crucify Bill Clinton over Monica Lewinsky... but Trump gets a “mulligan.” Seems the dems get no love from evangelicals?
evangelical-leaders-give-trump-a-mulligan-on-stormy-daniels
Posted from salon.com
Donald Trump
Ethics
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 12
5
5
0
What's confusing about it? We elected Trump to be our President, not our pastor or Pope. While our preference might be to have a perfect person as President, that ship sailed about 2000 years ago. So now, all that really matters is the policy. And Trump's policies are great for Christians.
(5)
(0)
Capt Dwayne Conyers
Imagine an active duty officer behaving that way without repercussions. Cannot. WWJD?
(0)
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
Capt Dwayne Conyers - I believe Jesus, faced with a crowd of people presenting the same situation you are presenting, said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
We weren't particularly worried about Clinton's ten year affair with Jennifer Flowers. Seemed to be consensual at the time.
Clinton's unwanted advances on Paula Jones were another matter, as were his rape of Juanita Broaderick, and unwanted advances on Kathleen Willey.
Monica Lewinsky was an intern, for pete's sake, barely twenty-two, with a crush on her powerful boss, whose defense in part was, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is,"
Mr. Trump was also a powerful man, but it is doubtful that Ms. Daniels was an intern or employee.
Clinton's unwanted advances on Paula Jones were another matter, as were his rape of Juanita Broaderick, and unwanted advances on Kathleen Willey.
Monica Lewinsky was an intern, for pete's sake, barely twenty-two, with a crush on her powerful boss, whose defense in part was, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is,"
Mr. Trump was also a powerful man, but it is doubtful that Ms. Daniels was an intern or employee.
(4)
(0)
4
4
0
Dang, no love from conservative RP. I find it funny that evangelicals sticking with their man (an admitted cheater in all aspects of his life) want to paint all opposers in a negative light. We see y'all.
(4)
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
SSG Jessica Bautista - Whose bodily autonomy?
Your position is very selfish and self-serving and makes no accommodation for the right to life of that unborn child. Liberals, who pride themselves on their scientific understanding, lost the right to life argument when science told them that life begins at conception. So when science didn't give them the answer they wanted, they ran to the courts and morphed the argument to one of personhood and argued that the unborn isn't a person until they are born; therefore, the unborn do not have any rights. Liberals will fight to defend a death row inmate from the death penalty [who deprived someone else of their life and is NOT innocent!], but when it comes to defending the rights of the unborn, they're happy to snuff out an innocent so that they don't have to be inconvenienced by the consequence of their actions. That's pretty sad.
People should be accountable for their actions, and when a woman becomes pregnant, she becomes a vessel containing another life and that life has to be taken into account. Your body no longer belongs solely to you. You share it with the unborn. There are two people whose needs must be considered and right to life trumps a woman's right to her body.
Your position is very selfish and self-serving and makes no accommodation for the right to life of that unborn child. Liberals, who pride themselves on their scientific understanding, lost the right to life argument when science told them that life begins at conception. So when science didn't give them the answer they wanted, they ran to the courts and morphed the argument to one of personhood and argued that the unborn isn't a person until they are born; therefore, the unborn do not have any rights. Liberals will fight to defend a death row inmate from the death penalty [who deprived someone else of their life and is NOT innocent!], but when it comes to defending the rights of the unborn, they're happy to snuff out an innocent so that they don't have to be inconvenienced by the consequence of their actions. That's pretty sad.
People should be accountable for their actions, and when a woman becomes pregnant, she becomes a vessel containing another life and that life has to be taken into account. Your body no longer belongs solely to you. You share it with the unborn. There are two people whose needs must be considered and right to life trumps a woman's right to her body.
(0)
(0)
Capt Dwayne Conyers
I guess nobody cared about the babies killed by those bombs Trump dropped on Syria...
(2)
(0)
SSG Jessica Bautista
Capt Dwayne Conyers Or kids living in poverty, on welfare. Nor the kids affected by education budget cuts. If bodily autonomy is secondary to life, then I expect we'll be seeing legislation mandating organ donation.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google