Avatar feed
Responses: 6
CPL Dave Hoover
9
9
0
And the battle for gun control began before the second amendment is penned. Sorry John, couldn't help myself. Great post and history share. SGT John " Mac " McConnell
(9)
Comment
(0)
SGT John " Mac " McConnell
SGT John " Mac " McConnell
6 y
Yes indeed CPL Dave Hoover ! You are so correct brother !
(4)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
9
9
0
SGT John " Mac " McConnell thanks for the historical share today.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SGT John " Mac " McConnell
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
3
3
0
Some 16th century military writers such as Sir John Smythe thought that an arquebus could not match accuracy of a bow in the hands of a highly skilled archer,[59] other military writers such as Humfrey Barwick and Barnabe Rich claimed the opposite.[60][61] An arquebus angled at 35 degrees could throw a bullet up to 1000 m or more,[62] much farther than any archers could shoot. An arquebus shot was considered deadly at up to 400 yards while the heavier Spanish musket was considered deadly at up to 600 yards.[61] During the Japanese Invasions of Korea, Korean officials claimed that they were at a severe disadvantage against Japanese troops because their arquebuses "could reach beyond several hundred paces."[63] In 1590 Smythe noted that arquebusiers and musketeers firing at such extreme distances rarely seemed to hit anything and instead decided to argue effective range, claiming that English archers like the ones from the Hundred Years' War would be more effective at 200-240 yards than arquebusiers or musketeers, but by that point there were no longer enough skilled archers in England to properly test his theories.[64]
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close