Sarah Huckabee Sanders offers a powerful response to comedian’s attacks. Here’s what she said.

PO3 Bob McCord - I would like to know your definition of class and how that compares to the attitudes and actions of both administrations.

PO3 Bob McCord - I didn't expect much from this answer, and I am still disappointed.

The main problem is that the first lady wore a tank top and shorts on Air Force One and President Obama put his feet on his desk? Did you happen to Google search "presidents with their feet on desk" to see countless Presidents before him do it? Are all of those men and their administrations classless as well?

Is class, to you, the way someone presents themselves or should there be a totality of factors in play here? Like, for instance, how they treat other people?

Methinks there is another underlying factor here?

How exactly is criticism of a comedian not supporting a free and independent press? How is an article that praises someone's reaction to what many perceived to be tasteless jokes an assault on the first amendment?

Personally, I thought the jokes were poorly delivered and not particularly funny. However, the format of the comedy at this function is akin to that of a roast. Don't want to be a target? Don't show up.

SFC Stephen Atchley - Who was criticising a comedian? I was referring to the insulting of the "liberal media" (apparently the conservative media is okay)

I actually hadn't read the article, but glad I did now. I find it amusing how those that prattle on about things being "too PC" get all twisted up in knots when they encounter something that hurts their delicate sensibilities.

The article was all about Sanders and her response to the comedian. Nothing in it constitutes and attack on a free and independent press.

As I said in my comment above. This is a big fuss about nothing of consequence. And, in this case, it the crowd that calls others 'snowflakes' when they claim offense at something that is doing all the griping about the comedian's routine.