14
14
0
This is just one of a plethora of outlets offering us the opportunity to read the full IG report of the FBI inspection. As we all know, when we hear there is an IG inspection coming soon to a unit near you, we would all rather run for the hills and have a complete series of GG shots then ride a hundred miles on an Army bus with no shocks or springs. But, here, for all to see, is the complete IG report. I have read most of it. I have searched for center or right-leaning outlets to find a more reasonable editorial review of the report. If you find one, please post. In view of the insane political climate in which we find ourselves today, I am worried. Things like this IG investigation costs millions of precious dollars, are but a mere symptom of the dysfunctional nature of our government. When the White House was in the left hand all those on the right side of the aisle raised a huge ruckus not that the tide has turned, the converse is true. Also of the political shenanigans lead only to insanity at the highest levels of the American way of government while the work of "Government" does not proceed as it should. WE should be scared, we should be concerned, we should be willing to follow what our Oath instructed us to do and we agreed to do. (I am NOT suggesting violence. Yet.)
FBI Response to OIG Report
Posted from fbi.gov
FBI
Political Correctness
Constitution
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 11
9
9
0
The entire theater on the Hill is so badly done no one watches anymore. The IG Report, mainly leftists involved, is a sham IMHO. No one will be sent to jail. All the libs watching the MSMs will be told "see, nothing to see here". And the divide will continue to grow.
(9)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
SSgt (Join to see) - OK, let's look at your statement, labeled from the other side:
The entire theater on the Hill is so badly done no one watches anymore. The IG Report, mainly neo-cons involved, is a sham IMHO. No one will be sent to jail. All the white supremacists conservatives watching Alex Jones and Breitbart will be told "see, nothing to see here". And the divide will continue to grow.
Your very language tells people on the opposite side of the conversation that it is pointless to discuss the matter, because they will be labeled and denigrated by that label. Plus, anyone who doesn't fit the label but who disagrees will also be labeled that way. It's the wrong way to reduce the divide.
The entire theater on the Hill is so badly done no one watches anymore. The IG Report, mainly neo-cons involved, is a sham IMHO. No one will be sent to jail. All the white supremacists conservatives watching Alex Jones and Breitbart will be told "see, nothing to see here". And the divide will continue to grow.
Your very language tells people on the opposite side of the conversation that it is pointless to discuss the matter, because they will be labeled and denigrated by that label. Plus, anyone who doesn't fit the label but who disagrees will also be labeled that way. It's the wrong way to reduce the divide.
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
Thanks Capt Gregory Prickett - I see a bit of what you are saying. Still trying to figure out how to talk about a highly charged subject (politics) in a neutral way. Mr Clinton, 1st term, was the last Dem I voted for at the national level. I've been Independent since that term. Every POTUS and, more importantly, their administration, Senate and SCOTUS has been a BIG disappointment since I became aware of politics in the early 70s.
Yes, every administration does some good things. At the same time, every administration sets something back as well. And no administration has ever really, truly handled the budget. But what really gets my goat is the lack of prosecution for clear violations of Law. But, then again, the political system has been taken over by lawyers.
Yes, every administration does some good things. At the same time, every administration sets something back as well. And no administration has ever really, truly handled the budget. But what really gets my goat is the lack of prosecution for clear violations of Law. But, then again, the political system has been taken over by lawyers.
(1)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
SSgt (Join to see) - it's tough to do it neutrally. Trump was the first time (since I first voted for Regan) that I did not vote GOP for president. I voted Libertarian this time, for Johnson. I can't stand either Trump or Clinton, so I regularly get hammered by both sides, lol.
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett - Trump was the first "Republican" I have voted for since I left the Democratic party near the end of Bill Clinton's tour. I register in one or the other party for the Primaries (Independents are not allowed to vote in those) but otherwise, I am an Independent.
The reason I voted for Trump is three-fold:
1) The promise of SCOTUS nominations
2) Draining the swamp
3) He was **NOT** a professional politician
2020 I have similar reasons to stick with Trump. But, again, it will depend on how well (badly) the game of politics is played out before the vote happens.
The reason I voted for Trump is three-fold:
1) The promise of SCOTUS nominations
2) Draining the swamp
3) He was **NOT** a professional politician
2020 I have similar reasons to stick with Trump. But, again, it will depend on how well (badly) the game of politics is played out before the vote happens.
(0)
(0)
6
6
0
5
5
0
IG reports are always a tough read and you often need to read between the lines. Haven't read yet, but suspect that is especially true with this one. Thanks for the link to the report.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google