Posted on Jun 26, 2018
Supreme Court finally ruled Japanese internment camps unconstitutional in decision on Trump’s...
926
3
7
1
1
0
Seven decades late but better than never. At least now it can not be used to justify interment camps.
Supreme Court finally ruled Japanese internment camps unconstitutional in decision on Trump’s...
Posted from rawstory.com
Supreme Court
Racism
WWII World War Two
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
0
0
0
It didn't do anything of the sort. Roberts specifically said that this case was unrelated to the previous case so his condemnation of the previous case so he was speaking in dicta which although persuasive doesn't set precedent.
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
He said it was unrelated to the Muslim ban not that it was unrelated to other internment camps.
(0)
(0)
SPC Andrew Murray
It's unrelated to the case which means that the supreme court is unable to make a ruling about it. The court can only rule upon the controversies brought before it and he said that this case is unrelated to the other case which means this ruling cannot be construed to mean that it overturns the other one.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Not cannon fodder , Heroes. Fodder would have fallen apart under that vile pretense of leadership and the caustics they took. I would never dismiss them so lightly. The 442nd/100th fight for WWIIs lost battalion should be.legendary. But it takes a special kind of man to fight so hard for a nation that has betrayed both you and itself.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google