Posted on Aug 11, 2018
The Navy Had Plans to Build the Ultimate Battleship. Here's Why It Never Happened.
1.67K
28
10
11
11
0
An interesting "what- if "scenario. if we had built these, we would have more Museum ships.
The Navy Had Plans to Build the Ultimate Battleship. Here's Why It Never Happened.
Posted from nationalinterest.orgPosted in these groups: Planned Ships
Naval/Maritime History
DesignNorfolk Naval ShipyardNaval Surface Warfare Center
Naval/Maritime History DesignNorfolk Naval ShipyardNaval Surface Warfare Center
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
4
4
0
I posted this one a few days ago. This puppy sure would have been a real Bad Ass ...Shut Yo Mouth!!!
(4)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Thank you for letting me know that you posted this a few days ago. I don't know what my Google he just showed me this a few minutes ago.
(1)
(0)
SCPO (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - No biggie, Steve. RallyPoint used to make a life-ending issue about double posts, but that has sure gone by the wayside.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SCPO (Join to see) I do usually check but I can't tell if it was supposed to days ago. I look at it this way, that they're trying to spread good information or a laugh out therefore those were tired of the constant anti Trump drum beat. That's why I posted my picture of my daughter at the anime convention with guys dressed up like something out of the Halo game to get rid of the three ring circus of dirty politics
(1)
(0)
SCPO (Join to see)
It's all good, Brother Canuck!!! (Or are you just a Yankee dressed in muk laks and simply living in Canada...I forget.)
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
The era before WWII was an interesting time as doctrine and tactics of air craft carriers and aircraft in future tactics and doctrine were mulled over by the planners. German and Britain's capital ships were the battleships as the Japanese and the US fleets evolved with the aircraft carriers. I can only assume the US had almost three times more air craft carriers do to the evolution of our navy and the industrial capacity to build them.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google