Posted on Sep 17, 2018
Kavanaugh approval instantly in peril. GOP gives conflicting signals after accuser speaks out.
1.38K
86
29
10
10
0
Here we go again. If the GOP allows Kavanaugh to be Borked, they deserve to be thrown out of office. Yes, that will leave us at the mercy of the Democrats, but we are already at their mercy, aren't we?
Kavanaugh approval instantly in peril. GOP gives conflicting signals after accuser speaks out.
Posted from bizpacreview.com
Supreme Court
Democrats
Republicans
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
7
7
0
It would seem so. It was reported this morning that Kavanaugh over his career, has undergone six FBI Background Imvestogations and cleared for the highest security clearance. How many confirmation processes has he already gone through? It’s been stated this allegation has been known since June. Why now? As with Clarence Thomas, another high tech lynching.
(7)
(0)
LTC David Brown
100% correct. The FBI has been asked to investigate and they stated there is nothing to investigate. This is supposedly a repressed memory. Very few details as to date, time, and place. So if she says may 18th 1982. He says I was in Montana with my family then she suddenly “ remembers it was June 3rd. Well the parents were house at the house she thinks it happened at. Oh, it was another house and on and on we go. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/open-gently/201504/we-dont-repress-painful-childhood-memories
We Don't Repress Painful Childhood Memories
Bits of hallucinations when we wake up during sleep paralysis can seem true.
(2)
(0)
SPC John Parmenter
Sadly, one must wonder if this woman is a paid operative. This make-believe "sexual assault" wasn't reported to law enforcement when it allegedly occurred. As a retired cop, I can say, "if it's not reported, it didn't happen." Now that Kavanaugh is about to be confirmed, a "secret letter" which had been in the possession of Senator Feinstein for months is made public. Clearly, this is another whack-a-doodle, left-wing lark. Look what they did to Bork! Look what they did to Thomas. Have they no decency?
(2)
(0)
5
5
0
Facts:
1) this was over 30 years ago with shaky evidence to support (her therapist contradicts who did it, but we are supposed to believe that her therapist is lying)
2) this "evidence" was known for over 2 months. Why wait until after the hearings to bring it out, other than to gum up the works.
3) the complainants parents and a judgment against them in a court presided over by Kavanaugh's mother...
4) he has been investigated out the wazoo by the FBI over 6 times, the backgrounder for Supreme Court is probably more intense, and they never deemed it a legitimate issue.
5) Durbin doesn't want a quick hearing on this this week, they need "time" to look into it. Time=play out the clock in the hope they retake the majority in the mid terms and can shoot it all down.
6) Feinstein. Enough said.
But, facts, we don't need no stinking facts....
1) this was over 30 years ago with shaky evidence to support (her therapist contradicts who did it, but we are supposed to believe that her therapist is lying)
2) this "evidence" was known for over 2 months. Why wait until after the hearings to bring it out, other than to gum up the works.
3) the complainants parents and a judgment against them in a court presided over by Kavanaugh's mother...
4) he has been investigated out the wazoo by the FBI over 6 times, the backgrounder for Supreme Court is probably more intense, and they never deemed it a legitimate issue.
5) Durbin doesn't want a quick hearing on this this week, they need "time" to look into it. Time=play out the clock in the hope they retake the majority in the mid terms and can shoot it all down.
6) Feinstein. Enough said.
But, facts, we don't need no stinking facts....
(5)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
Also, we should consider WHY Kavanaughs record wasn't available for review prior to the hearings. Perhaps if he had been transparent, this wouldn't be an issue now.
(It probably would have been because both parties are just throwing temper tantrums ad naseum.)
(It probably would have been because both parties are just throwing temper tantrums ad naseum.)
(1)
(0)
4
4
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google