Posted on May 21, 2019
Judge Upholds House Democrats Subpoena For Pres. Trump's Financial Records | The Last Word |...
905
21
16
5
5
0
Office of the President (POTUS)
Corruption
Congress
Law
Justice
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
Capt Gregory Prickett
The stay was denied. If the company does not provide the documents, they can be held in contempt of court and fined. Remember, that Trump doesn't control the records in question.
(2)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett the appeal has already happened, so a stay is almost assured
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
1SG (Join to see) - not correct. The Circuit Court may very well deny a stay. A similar case in 2016 on a Senate subpoena was completely resolved in under 40 days from the date of the District Court decision to the Supreme Court denying cert.
Besides, the likelihood of Trump winning on the merits is extremely slim. His legal argument is weak, and when you have that type of a case, a stay may not be necessary.
Besides, the likelihood of Trump winning on the merits is extremely slim. His legal argument is weak, and when you have that type of a case, a stay may not be necessary.
(2)
(0)
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
0
0
0
Greg, you are like a cat with a laser dot on the wall, jumping, flipping, clawing. You did that for two years with Mueller. Will there become a point at which the embarrassment for being wrong so many times will curb your enthusiasm for jumping on bandwagons?
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
I wasn't wrong with Mueller. He outlined 9 or 10 clear cases of obstruction of justice by Trump.
When are you going to stop believing everything that the Cheeto says?
When are you going to stop believing everything that the Cheeto says?
(2)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Capt Gregory Prickett - How many indictments were there for obstruction Greg...Spoiler: zero. You are wrong again. Mueller outlined instances but none rose individually or collectively to an obstruction case or he would have gone after it.
You have been wrong and continue to be wrong because your view is "orange man bad, must be removed" rather than following evidence. You are a lawyer by trade and seem to have forgotten that concept. Your politics drives your legal view.
Your early warning on this whole fiasco should have been the FISA warrants on Carter Page. He was FISA'd and renewed 4 times and yet not a single charge to this date against him (and there will be none) and he was the reason for the warrants. Hmmm Greg, what might that tell a legally trained mind? In your case, you waltz right passed the obvious looking for the evidence you want to believe but cannot find and 2 years of a special counsel did not find.
You are the pure ideologue and don't even recognize it, that is how far gone you are. I allowed Mueller to wrap up, look for indictments, there were none, so I moved on. You are still like the child throwing a tantrum in the candy aisle. I don't have to listen to what the president says. Mueller had 2 years 3 million dollars and zero indictments for collusion/conspiracy with Russia by any American and zero indictments on obstruction. Those are facts you are unwilling to accept but are true none-the-less.
You have been wrong and continue to be wrong because your view is "orange man bad, must be removed" rather than following evidence. You are a lawyer by trade and seem to have forgotten that concept. Your politics drives your legal view.
Your early warning on this whole fiasco should have been the FISA warrants on Carter Page. He was FISA'd and renewed 4 times and yet not a single charge to this date against him (and there will be none) and he was the reason for the warrants. Hmmm Greg, what might that tell a legally trained mind? In your case, you waltz right passed the obvious looking for the evidence you want to believe but cannot find and 2 years of a special counsel did not find.
You are the pure ideologue and don't even recognize it, that is how far gone you are. I allowed Mueller to wrap up, look for indictments, there were none, so I moved on. You are still like the child throwing a tantrum in the candy aisle. I don't have to listen to what the president says. Mueller had 2 years 3 million dollars and zero indictments for collusion/conspiracy with Russia by any American and zero indictments on obstruction. Those are facts you are unwilling to accept but are true none-the-less.
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Cpl Jeff N. - DOJ policy states that you cannot indict a sitting president. Did you forget that? Did you forget that 700 former federal prosecutors have all said that they could obtain convictions with the evidence in the Mueller report?
As to the ideologue? You're projecting again.
As to the ideologue? You're projecting again.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google