Posted on Oct 8, 2019
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Bible in Schools case
924
7
3
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
Wrongly decided IMHO.
This suit was originally ally (and correctly, IMHO) ruled void for mootness.
The course no longer exists, and the plaintiffs aren't even in the school system, anymore. The plajntiffs were seeking redress of POTENTIAL harm, at least according to the article. Potential harm which simply cannot happen.
I do not agree with having the BITS program, and agree with getting it axed. But the continuing suit should not be allowed.
This suit was originally ally (and correctly, IMHO) ruled void for mootness.
The course no longer exists, and the plaintiffs aren't even in the school system, anymore. The plajntiffs were seeking redress of POTENTIAL harm, at least according to the article. Potential harm which simply cannot happen.
I do not agree with having the BITS program, and agree with getting it axed. But the continuing suit should not be allowed.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next