Posted on Oct 22, 2019
Top diplomat Bill Taylor gives 'disturbing' testimony on Trump's Ukraine dealings, Democrats say
3.76K
116
63
9
9
0
Ukraine
Donald Trump
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
4
4
0
Sen. Thune said "not so good", maybe some Reps are sweating reelection. Just get normal again and start fixing issues, especially infrastructure. Please.
(4)
(0)
CWO3 (Join to see)
The only opinions that matter from this point on are those handed down by the Courts. It's obvious the US and RP are divided, and in some cases that's due to being misinformed or even willfully inaccurate to support their opinion. Do a little research and stick to facts. Not liking the process is far different than saying the process is unlawful. One is opinion, the other fact. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/25/politics/grand-jury-impeachment-mueller/index.html
Judge says impeachment inquiry is legal and justifies disclosing grand jury material
A federal judge on Friday gave a legal endorsement to the House Democrats' impeachment probe into President Donald Trump and ordered the Justice Department to release grand jury information redacted from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
(0)
(0)
CWO3 (Join to see)
Fox & Friends SCHOOLED On Impeachment By Contributor
Become a TYT member at: http://tyt.com/EMMA The Young Turks’ Emma Vigeland (https://Twitter.com/EmmaVigeland) breaks down Fox News analyst Judge Andrew Napol...
Fox & Friends (disregard TYT after segment due to bias) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nInJdHuT8GI
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
How would we know??? His testimony is being done in seclusion, not being released to the public and only selective leaks are being made. You are being spoon fed and you don't seem to realize it.
(4)
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Correct - page 182 of the document, 187 of the .pdf file that includes intro, table of contents, etc.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
LTC Stephen B. - Yeah, I am sure all those unreported Russian contacts, changes to the Republican platform to weaken support to Ukraine, calls for the G7 to readmit Russia, Paul Manafort functioning as chairman of the Trump campaign, pulling out of Syria allowing Russia free reign, all the cash purchases of Trump properties by Russians, Trump undermining NATO, Trump's secret chats and public deference to Putin.... all just a big coincidence.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Steve, lay off the hooch a little. You are an angry drunk and it making you look a little unhinged. I know not picking up E9 was a blow for you but you will get past it. IT is time to move on and try to fins something you can actually follow all the way through on.
While there are no strict guidelines (and I did not say there were) I also know reading comprehension in one of those things that goes with inebriation. There is precedent and there is fairness to the target of an impeachment whether a judge or a president.
This is another con job by the democrats. They are breaking with precedent because they have no real high crimes or misdemeanors to pursue. If they did, they would have already put them forward. This is another fishing expedition (as was Mueller) and you will be as disappointed at the end of this as you were when you cried like a little bitch over the Mueller outcome.
These committees are not grand jury's. There is no comparison there at all. You keep pretending there is but there is not. I explained the difference, as usual you are only interested in an outcome to your liking not a process that is transparent, open and fair.
There would be no media circus if this were being done in the open as all 3 other impeachments of presidents have been done. You have been wrong at every turn on the Mueller investigation and every other "scandal" that has come down the pike just as you will be wrong here. The dems have enough votes in the house to impeach tomorrow if they wanted to do so. They may even do so. The senate will not remove him from office and you will be back at the bar yelling in a drunken rage at the other patrons...again.
While there are no strict guidelines (and I did not say there were) I also know reading comprehension in one of those things that goes with inebriation. There is precedent and there is fairness to the target of an impeachment whether a judge or a president.
This is another con job by the democrats. They are breaking with precedent because they have no real high crimes or misdemeanors to pursue. If they did, they would have already put them forward. This is another fishing expedition (as was Mueller) and you will be as disappointed at the end of this as you were when you cried like a little bitch over the Mueller outcome.
These committees are not grand jury's. There is no comparison there at all. You keep pretending there is but there is not. I explained the difference, as usual you are only interested in an outcome to your liking not a process that is transparent, open and fair.
There would be no media circus if this were being done in the open as all 3 other impeachments of presidents have been done. You have been wrong at every turn on the Mueller investigation and every other "scandal" that has come down the pike just as you will be wrong here. The dems have enough votes in the house to impeach tomorrow if they wanted to do so. They may even do so. The senate will not remove him from office and you will be back at the bar yelling in a drunken rage at the other patrons...again.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
Cpl Jeff N. - Well Slappy, being drunk may be the only way your inane ramblings make any bit of sense. Riddle me this, why should I consider the dubious legal analysis of an up-jumped airline stewardess over that of a Judge in good standing? Are you trying to imply that you know more than the judiciary?
Furthermore, we both know you have absolutely no integrity, which seriously harms your credibility. You will just have to excuse me for thinking you are full of shit when you have failed to show you are anything but. Besides, I can't learn anything from you that Sean Hannity hasn't already said.
I am going to get another beer.
Furthermore, we both know you have absolutely no integrity, which seriously harms your credibility. You will just have to excuse me for thinking you are full of shit when you have failed to show you are anything but. Besides, I can't learn anything from you that Sean Hannity hasn't already said.
I am going to get another beer.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
The information and Trumps admission of guilt. Also keep in mind The Who cares get over it tee shirt, was short lived.
Also keep in mind if this was a democratic President, the Republican Party would be doing the exact same thing.
So the question, is this about Republican Party protectionism of the Party, or the President.
Also keep in mind if this was a democratic President, the Republican Party would be doing the exact same thing.
So the question, is this about Republican Party protectionism of the Party, or the President.
(4)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
Both. They are protecting themselves and Trump as more important than being good stewards of the nation. The Reps can say over and over again about fake news, media bias, and unwarranted attacks, but the truth of the matter is, Trump and the government have said and committed some stupid actions. We have a difficult time focusing on his malfeasance because the velocity is high.
(3)
(0)
SN Donald Hoffman
Unfortunately true. I hope everyone looks at the information from more than one source. MAJ Ken Landgren
(2)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
SN Donald Hoffman - He is supposed to uphold the constitution instead of skirting around it.
(3)
(0)
SN Donald Hoffman
True, he has scored the Constitution and the rule of law. He will have to face the rule of law.MAJ Ken Landgren
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google