Avatar feed
Responses: 2
MAJ Ken Landgren
4
4
0
DOJ is on Trumps side despite their mission: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.

I knew the DOJ was corrupt when they claimed children at detention centers have humane living conditions despite the squalor.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
>1 y
I appreciate your response sir.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Sir, I realize we don’t agree politically on much, but I like your definition of what the DOJ does. I respectively submit the DOJ is currently working on exactly what your definition states: obvious crimes that were committed before and after the 2016 Election. The next year and a half are going to be an interesting sleigh ride, lets sit back and enjoy the ride!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
2
2
0
Turned out there was no Whistle blower Report, once the person spoke with Shiff’s staff, effectively it became Shiff’s complaint.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Orderly Room Ncoic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Robert Mark Odom - Did Schiff write the complaint? probably not, but, his staff did have a hand in it, and by proxy he had a hand in it. So is Schiff's fingerprints on the report, yes. The guy does a great job of poisoning everything he touches.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ukraine-whistleblower-did-not-inform-inspector-general-of-contact-with-adam-schiffs-panel
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/07/politics/adam-schiff-whistleblower-donald-trump-fact-check/index.html
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Robert Mark Odom - My sources are the same as yours, what’s probably different is how we look at the information the media gives us, to me that consists of identifying facts, and then how we interpret the facts.
In this case the facts are that a person came to Schiff with a complaint, and after some period of time (we don’t know how long) went to the IG with a complaint. After this we don’t know anything plain and simple.
Now to the interpretation of the facts: We know Schiff hates President Trump and will lie to take him down. How do I know this? For 2 years Schiff said he has first hand knowledge of President Trump conspiring and/or being an agent for the Russian Government. The “facts” Schiff reference were never found by Muller’s investigation because if they were: charges would have surfaced for an immediate impeachment of President Trump; therefore, Schiff is identified as a liar. Back to the question at hand, Schiff had a swamp creature (a person) that once worked with Former Vice President Biden come forward with a complaint against President Trump for investigating wrongdoing before and after the 2016 Elections. In my opinion during this time Schiff and his staff helped this swamp creature craft his complaint better and researched the best way to advance the second hand complaint (probably more lies), and bulletproof the complaint to cause the most damage to President Trump: go to the IG as a whistleblower. The one fault of this logic in my opinion is that after he went to Schiff, he couldn’t claim to be a whistleblower, that’s why he neglected to tell the IG he had sought guidance from Schiff. If the IG had known this (in addition to the fact that he worked for Biden before), the IG would never have accepted the complaint as a whistleblower.
Sorry to be so long winded, but to explain a complex situation and how to evaluate it, isn’t easy. Think about these situations: Senior Congress Members willing to lie to destroy a political opponent!!! And using our Country’s institutions by allowing lies to be admitted as facts to destroy a political opponent. They basically have corrupted our entire system of governing. They must be prosecuted and tried in a court of law if our Country is to survive as we know it. There is so much evidence out right now that shows how the CIA, FBI, DOJ, and State Department used lies to use our Country’s resources to attack President Trump, that’s it irrefutable. The only question is how long will the American People allow our politicians to lie for their personal enrichment? I submit that was done back in 2016 and the liars and criminals that assisted them are now in full panic because when the charges come through the current AG’s Office, they will be exposed to their base for what they are: corrupt criminals and liars who have been enriching themselves, and their families, some for the past 60 years. Again, I apologize for being so long.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) - Thanks, I didn’t see this article before. In my opinion Schiff and his entire staff needs to be deposed to find out what they know and how they helped to advance second hand information as a formal complaint.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) I Appreciate your response however, I do stand on my initial statement. Have a blessed day brother.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close