Avatar feed
Responses: 6
LTC Multifunctional Logistician
6
6
0
So a Democrat controlled inquiry, with anti Trump political activists. What specific law again was violated or was it hurt feelings again?
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
SPC Erich Guenther
>1 y
And you should ask: "What legal cases precede this one with that interpretation of campaign finance law........or is this the first case?" Democrats won't ask those questions because they challenge the Party line and they might be accused of "gasp" critical thinking when they read a news story. Both are idealogical crimes that carry severe sanction in the Democratic party of today.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ James Woods
6
6
0
So far Taylor’s and Sondland’s testimonies had been reported as confirming the allegations of using government resources in a manner that is an abuse of power. Can’t wait for them to testify again under oath in a public hearing. I don’t care if GOP Senators don’t impeach. Americans should know all the facts before the election. Consider Americans having to decide on voting for Clinton had the impeachment came before the ‘96 election and voters knew what they know about him now. That’s the perspective I have.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Nothing confirms anything until all questions and answers are published in context. Short of that, it’s just a side show.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) Yep. Whistleblower complaint. WH released transcript summary. Taylor’s opening statement. Sondland’s testimony. Official text messages between State Dept. officials. Public acknowledgements from Trump, Mulvaney, and Giuliani. And that’s just for starters. Yep I can see how you need more answers and context. Haha!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
MAJ James Woods - What the Deep State and/or President Trump haters don’t want to recognize, is that just because tongues wag it doesn’t mean it had any effect on the situation in question. Besides that: once the person went to Schiff’s staff and received advise, and then fraudulently didn’t disclose that to the IG he or she isn’t a whistleblower. I can’t wait until Schiff is called to testify in the Senate, and then this person is called in and cross examined properly. Its going to be so much fun to see Schiff wiggle under cross examination. Everything that has been done after that is pretty mush naught, except for it being a waste of our tax dollars, and wasting time they should be working on trade agreements to make our Country better. I so dislike political hacks.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) As much as it bothers folks that the whistleblower conversed with an aide on Schiff’s staff it doesn’t change the confirmed details of the phone call. WH transcript and statements from people appointed by Trump or Pompeo all confirmed the allegations of the whistleblower. This conspiracy that Schiff somehow fabricated these allegations with coordination with the whistleblower is laughable. What’s a waste of taxpayer money is the constant golfing at Trump resorts, three years of “feel good” rallies to the same pro Trump states and cities, and the constant reinvestigation into HRC email server looking for a deep state that doesn’t exist. But hey you keep hoping for Schiff to squirm during cross examination when public hearings begin. It’s hacks like GOP Jordan that will be in a panic trying to claim Trump appointees and an Army career combat veteran of being spies and traitors.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
5
5
0
Stop with the “Star Chamber” one sided investigation and gain some degree of credibility. When all we get are selective leaks from this Top Secret guilty as charged forum, I doubt anything being divulged. Another instance of when did you stop beating your wife. Is there no limits to the radical Democrats effort to overturn the votes of 63 million voters. Due process is fundamental to our justice system.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close