Russian Transgressions Met With increasingly Weak US Response | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
This was so serious the Obama administration would not/did not provide lethal aid to the Ukrainians. Trump at least provided lethal aid.
2. 2016 Election Interference. Whatever happened during that time it happened under, you guessed it, Obama again! Ooh, Maddow is right, Obama gave Putin a stern a warning (you better stop it) and expelled some diplomats and slapped a few sanctions after the fact, so what.
Who really wants to go to war with Russia over two assassinations, one in GB the other in Germany? The answer is no one.
You could make the argument, based upon the incidents she listed that Russia activity has quieted since 2017. An assassination in Berlin and the UK pale in comparison to the invasion of Crimea and election interference do they not?
You could do a similar look at China and I think the risk from that side would be greater than from Russia.
https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2019/oct/25/matt-gaetz/matt-gaetz-says-obama-permanently-stopped-military/
Gaetz misleads about Obama's record on Ukraine military aid
U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., has become one of President Donald Trump’s key attack dogs as he pushes back against the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry through protests, regular Fox News appearances and on Twitter. As part of his defense of Trump, the second-term north Florida congressman has pointed the finger at former President Barack Obama’s actions related to Ukraine.
Politifacts "conclusion:
Gaetz said, "Barack Obama put a permanent stop on this MILITARY AID to the Ukraine - he never allowed it to go."
Obama did not permanently stop MILITARY AID to Ukraine.
The element of truth in Gaetz's statement is the Obama administration did not provide LETHAL MILITARY AID that Ukraine asked for in 2014. However, it did provide OTHER MILITARY EQUIPMENT and training. The United States has provided $1.6 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since 2014, on average $300 million a year.
Also from your bogus fact check: In July 2016, the White House announced a $335 million security assistance package for Ukraine that included "counter-artillery and counter-mortar radars, secure communications, training aids, logistics infrastructure and IT systems, tactical UAVs, and medical equipment." Steve, this is also non lethal aid.
Politifact calls this "mostly false because Gaetz used the words MILITART AID and not LETHAL MITARY AID in his text.. The "element" of truth is about the LETHAL aid. You really ought to work on your reading comprehension skills. You continue to show up here and embarrass yourself. I will wait for your apology.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
Above is a "fact check" from CNN that admits the Obama admin provided NO LETHAL MILITRY AID.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-leader-calls-for-more-western-military-aid [login to see]
A story about the aid with no weapons from the WSJ
Fact-checking Trump's claim that Obama gave Ukraine 'pillows and sheets'
While the Obama Administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal assistance to Ukraine, it did provide over a hundred million dollars in security assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
The fact is "The 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, which became law in November 2015, [Obama Administration] called for "lethal assistance such as anti-armor weapon systems, mortars, crew-served weapons and ammunition, grenade launchers and ammunition, and small arms and ammunition." - The Obama administration authorized lethal aid.
The Obama admin also took other action:
1) Led the effort to kick Russia of the G8
2) Imposed economic sanctions on Russia targeting their oil industry to include a multi-billion dollar deal with Exxon
3) Strategically invested heavily in military infrastructure in eastern Europe to facilitate increased US and NATO response if needed
4) Provided millions in military aid to Ukraine to include lethal military aid authorized in 2015, well before Trump was elected.
You are wrong again, and as always, too stupid and dishonest to argue with. Stick to loading luggage and handing out the peanuts.
Now...a counterpoint.
We invaded Iraq on by what any "reasonable" person may call tenuous justification. It's possible we have been "interfering" with the governments of both Iraq and Afghanistan (and I'm sure other places) for going on two decades now. We theoretically "assassinate" leaders of foreign terror groups all the time... we'd just do it with sophisticated and expensive weapons, or highly trained operatives, as opposed to poisons and other more "underhanded" means (as far as we know). For each of these instances, I could provide substantive arguments supporting why each was at least "necessary" to the interests of national security, if not morally and ethically justified.
I honestly don't know if Trump is trying to buddy-up to Russia or not. I think it's always good to look behind the curtain and make sure we know who is pulling the strings. However, I also think it makes at least some sense to avoid a conventional war with them if at all possible. Let's not forget that the EU depends heavily on Russia for fossil fuels, and an energy crisis there could spark off a regional, if not global conflict involving nuclear arsenals. Everyone loses if that ever happens, so there has to be a price we're willing to pay to avoid it. I'm guessing the President...any President, has to take that into account when forming policy.
As to the elections... I've simply not seen anything that convinces me Trump won for any other reason than a substantial portion of the United States isn't ready to embrace institutional humanism, and socialism quite yet.
I'm not a "Cold Warrior"... my war was with radical Islamic jihad. In that sense, I have to ask myself if the "devil" I know, is better than the one I do not. Russia isn't communist any longer... they've gone back to being "Imperialists"-and they don't like Islamic extremists any more than we do. Moreover, they're fighting them, while most of NATO isn't. They've allied themselves with some sordid people to do so, but arguably...so have we. They're also far from Bosom Friends with China... possibly the most dangerous semi-superpower threat we currently face.
Things change, and maybe idealism takes a back seat to realism when you live on a planet full of enemies.
All roads lead to Russia.