Posted on Apr 24, 2020
The Dark Truth About Fauci and Birx, Bill Gates And Globalist Elites
1.5K
11
8
2
2
0
There are links to source material throughout the article.
The Dark Truth About Fauci and Birx, Bill Gates And Globalist Elites
Posted from nationalfile.com
Ethics
Medical
Government
Propaganda
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 4
2
2
0
This is bunk. Even the VA, which in under the executive direction of the President, has results from two hydroxychloroquine studies they conducted, with both concluding patients who were treated with the medicine had worse outcomes than those who received no treatment.
Stop posting this fake crap. It’s doing more harm than good.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/929253
Stop posting this fake crap. It’s doing more harm than good.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/929253
Hydroxychloroquine Ineffective for COVID-19, VA Study Suggests
The retrospective study, which included data from 368 men hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 and treated in VA medical centers, showed an association between HCQ and higher mortality.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Never heard of this site before. But after reviewing this article, the website itself, and other topics, this is conspiracy junk that’s trying to sensationalize a lot of half baked stories. They must live in some alternative universe somewhere.
(2)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
As you yourself stated, you did not read the article but 'reviewed' it and dismissed it out of hand.
Interesting that the source information behind the article quite a bit of it actually comes from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's website and from the NIH, the WHO and other sources such as financial sites such as Morningstar, and foreign news organizations such as the UKs The Daily Mail.
So it seems that you a poor at making an honest review, but only one that fits your preconceived viewpoint.
Interesting that you call the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation information conspiracy junk. At least Bill Gates states what his objective is though you apparently do not understand it.
Interesting that the source information behind the article quite a bit of it actually comes from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's website and from the NIH, the WHO and other sources such as financial sites such as Morningstar, and foreign news organizations such as the UKs The Daily Mail.
So it seems that you a poor at making an honest review, but only one that fits your preconceived viewpoint.
Interesting that you call the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation information conspiracy junk. At least Bill Gates states what his objective is though you apparently do not understand it.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Neil Greenfield
Sorry, but I’m a fan of the work his foundation is doing. SSG Robert Webster
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Who-We-Are/General-Information/Letter-from-Bill-and-Melinda-Gates
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Who-We-Are/General-Information/Letter-from-Bill-and-Melinda-Gates
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
We seek to unlock the possibility inside every individual. We see equal value in all lives. And so we are dedicated to improving the quality of life for individuals around the world. From the education of students in Chicago, to the health of a young mother in Nigeria, we are catalysts of human promise everywhere.
(1)
(0)
MSgt Neil Greenfield
Okay then. If you want to argue semantics over “read” versus “review”, that’s fine. I “readviewed” the article. The author may have used source material, but he sure does take things to quite a different level to sensationalize what he thinks to get his point across and take things in different direction (as in out of context).
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google