Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SPC Erich Guenther
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
If there is a problem historically provide a point by point refutation of where the document is incorrect and we as a country should discuss. That is the right way to do this if the grounds for removal were accuracy vs idealogical. It was not done and most people can conclude why.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
0
0
0
Experts have stated that the report, published by a group of conservative political operatives and academics, is filled with nothing but falsehoods and distorted accounts that are well documented about how discrimination is a foundation of this country and continues to exist in various forms hundreds of years later.

The report does nothing but whitewash history (which is how history has been written for generations). It's all bullshit, 1/4 plagiarized and had absolutely no historians on the panel. It was just a way to rebuke the 1619 project. That's it.

It just further highlights white privilege - and you can disagree and moan about how there's no such as white privilege. But there is - and this 1776 report reeks of it. As do the people who support it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
0
0
0
25% of that 'report' was plagiarized. It was not objective at all. It was a massive cluster and never should have happened. It was utterly pointless.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close