White House facing optics issue with Kamala Harris’ ambitious niece

Can't be worse than Billy Beer....

RallyPoint has updated the tags in your discussion: "White House facing optics issue with Kamala Harris’ ambitious niece". Your original tags were:
BUSINESS, CORRUPTION, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS
Your new tags are now:
BUSINESS, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS
The discussion tags were changed by LTC Kevin Broom, PhD.
Please refer to our RallyPoint Answers Tag Guide for future reference. If you checked out the guide and still have any questions, feel free to reply to us through this email. Thanks!
The RallyPoint Team

I object to RP changing my tags to delete “CORRUPTION” as I believe tags, just as honest opinion posts, are protected by free Speech. As stated in the article posted: “The book was published in June 2020, before Kamala was vice president, and thus breaks no laws. But White House officials told Politico the book couldn’t have been published today because it uses Kamala’s name and likeness. It’s unclear whether Meena is allowed to continue to draw royalties for the book, and she won’t say if she still is.” From Wikipedia: “Corruption is a form of dishonesty or criminal offense undertaken by a person or organization entrusted with a position of authority, to acquire illicit benefit or abuse power for one's private gain. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries.”

In my opinion when people go into business themselves as Ms. Meena Harris did in this case, they become a public figure and must take the consequences of actions they perform. That she had to be told to take here fingers out of the cookie jar is evidence enough. That royalties are in question and she makes no definitive statement, I say this smacks of Corruption. The truth of it aside, Ms. Harris is a public figure by her own choice. MHO As I said before: Please leave my Free Speech alone.