Posted on Feb 12, 2021
Lac-Megantic: The runaway train that destroyed a town
1.31K
21
17
7
7
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
LTC (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett I will not ague with you. I do not have the need to be right.
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
LTC (Join to see) - Good, because my next question would be whether any children that you and your First Nation wife might have had--should they be considered American? After all, they would be only 25% American blood, wouldn't they?
(0)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett - Sir, You are truly a disagreeable person to call me out my name and insinuate I have no respect and tell you to stop saying stuff when “you are replying to me under my post”. While I do not want to argue with you, I will not allow myself to be maligned. Time for an honest After Action Review:
You mentioned the “tribe” voted against the pipe and brought up the question of why one would want this pipe route to go through the tribe’s land "on my post". I explained it was probably cost. You brought up a cost factor of the alternative pipe routes and I brought up some additional factors for your consideration and pointed out that we don’t really know the facts and need to trust the Elders to make the best decision for their people. I offered no comment on the decisions the Elders made and felt you were portraying them as people who needed to be defended by others. This is why I said “I believe you do them an injustice.”; because they don’t need any outside help from an engineer or a lawyer.
Then you go all flip on me with poor language telling me not to tell you what to do (I never did) and then bringing up the poor treatment of your family out of the blue. I highlighted that I never asked you to defer to me and then you bring me back into a discussion calling me by name. Well, what can one say to that? I say “Good day Sir”.
You mentioned the “tribe” voted against the pipe and brought up the question of why one would want this pipe route to go through the tribe’s land "on my post". I explained it was probably cost. You brought up a cost factor of the alternative pipe routes and I brought up some additional factors for your consideration and pointed out that we don’t really know the facts and need to trust the Elders to make the best decision for their people. I offered no comment on the decisions the Elders made and felt you were portraying them as people who needed to be defended by others. This is why I said “I believe you do them an injustice.”; because they don’t need any outside help from an engineer or a lawyer.
Then you go all flip on me with poor language telling me not to tell you what to do (I never did) and then bringing up the poor treatment of your family out of the blue. I highlighted that I never asked you to defer to me and then you bring me back into a discussion calling me by name. Well, what can one say to that? I say “Good day Sir”.
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
SFC (Join to see) - Except you keep saying that the Elders support the pipeline, and that's simply not true. And you have been informed, several times that it's not true, yet you continue to spread the lie.
Then you told me not to worry about an Indian issue? That you had "worked" with Indians in the past, as if that made you some kind of Indian expert? You say that they don't need assistance from lawyers, who the hell do you think is handling their lawsuit for them?
Then you told me not to worry about an Indian issue? That you had "worked" with Indians in the past, as if that made you some kind of Indian expert? You say that they don't need assistance from lawyers, who the hell do you think is handling their lawsuit for them?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next