Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Lt Col Charlie Brown
3
3
0
I am sure it would. I suggest we do the same for automakers so that we can sue them when we're hit by a drunk driver!
(3)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
Lt Col Charlie Brown
3 y
COL Robert Grierson exactly Sir!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David S.
2
2
0
Seems this approach would open the federal government to litigation due to requiring background checks and in the taxing of firearms. If firearm manufacturers know that guns are inherently dangerous seems that in taxing and licensing such devices that the federal government is as well complicit in their requirements for ownership.

This opens up a number of manufacturers to all sorts of liable cases. What about alcohol and pharma manufacturers? Alcohol impairs motor skills there for ever death related to drinking and driving makes the manufacturer liable, as well the store that sold the alcohol, the company that distributed the alcohol, the clerk that sold the alcohol and even the state that taxed the alcohol and so on. Where does this distinction end as well - knives, blunt objects, pillows....
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Environmental Specialist
2
2
0
So if he can't ban the guns he will try to make the gun makers go bankrupt and end the supply of guns, which means people will just import the guns if possible.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC David S.
SPC David S.
3 y
I have a feeling guns designs are going to change making it very easy for people to make firearms in the home. What is congress going to do to stop 3D guns - Shut down the internet? Prohibit 3D printing?

https://slate.com/technology/2021/02/3d-printed-semi-automatic-rifle-fgc-9.html
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close