Avatar feed
Responses: 5
SGT Unit Supply Specialist
5
5
0
SSgt (Join to see) The jurors made the correct decision. Now it's the additional 3 Officers time to stand before the Judge & Jury. I agree the Representative's remarks were inappropriate & may result in a higher courts overturning the verdict... resulting in a new trial. However, the Representatives remarks pale in comparion to the remarks of many speaking on Jan 6th just prior to the insurrection. IMO...
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Owner/Operator
SSgt (Join to see)
3 y
Trials are supposed to strip the emotion aside and judge on the facts. The Representatives remarks have been consistent over months and years and has been nothing but vitriol polluting the hearts of too many people.

I will say that the *representation* of words and actions by those sources most of us consume (social media, news media) has so completely skewed reality that when I see comments like yours I realize it has caught another one. Get off the social media sites, disconnect from the MSMs, spend 2 or 3 weeks this way and research for yourself.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Unit Supply Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
3 y
SSgt (Join to see) - Thanks for you concern... however I noticed you totally avoided the Jan. 6th comments. FYI you are hardly qualified to describe my reality and how I gather my information.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Owner/Operator
SSG (Join to see)
3 y
SSgt (Join to see) - you just shared an article from the MSM. Are they only valid when they are in agreement with you?
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Owner/Operator
SSgt (Join to see)
3 y
SSG (Join to see) - rofl!

Yes - I shared from a MSM. I *could* write a story myself and all I would get is "you made that all up". Catch-22!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1LT William Clardy
5
5
0
One of the more sober post-conviction analyses I've seen. And I think he makes some very valid points (they'd be good ones if most folks took them to heart).
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Owner/Operator
4
4
0
Chauvin is guilty a hell. No ifs ands buts about it. This article is one of many that try to create this alternate narrative and sow doubt into the minds of some people that somehow he didn't get a fair trial. That's bullshit.

The threat became a part of the court record, and as the judge told Chauvin's defense lawyer, "Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned."

For the judge to even bring up Maxine Waters in the trial is ridiculous. Why should anyone on that jury care what she said? Plenty of people have something to say about the trial but their words don't mean jack and honestly I never even herd what she said until now. Does it change my opinion? No.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SGT Unit Supply Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
3 y
SSG (Join to see) Very well spoken... I agree 100%. I didn't even look at what he pasted... it didn't mean jack to me... guilty is guilty. Now for the remaining three.
On a different note... thanks for your comments about Barrow's position tendency to post only what he believes...you hit the nail on the head.
(4)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
3 y
I'm confused, SGT (Join to see). Do you make a habit of posting things you don't believe? If you don't, why do you imply that SSgt (Join to see) should?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close