Lindsey Graham Preparing Bill to Mobilize Trained Military Veterans as School Security Officers

At the source...I agree...The source of our violence is not holding the perpetrators accountable. When you remove the consequences for these acts you only encourage those who are so inclined. Our nation, our way of governance and life is under attack by the socialists and liberals who hate America and what she stands for. The justice system is broken by the liberal polices in effect and the Soros supported DAs who are not enforcing the laws "as they are written."

The Second Amendment is there for several reasons; chief among them is the right for us to defend ourselves as we see fit. And yes the Buffalo retired police officer did die after unloading his gun center of mass on the perp. At some point he should have tried for head shots.

LTC Thomas Tennant - How do you hold a perpetrator accountable when they are dead?
This problem cannot be solved by law enforcement alone. It cannot be solved by more guns.
These are mental health issues, societal issues, and easy access to firearms.
Thank you.

First of all...access to firearms are not that easy. Here in KY we have to go thru the normal background checks. I do agree that mental health support is an issue, but you can point to the liberal policies that cut that support in half over the years since 1970's and the Carter administration. As to societal issues, again look to the liberal polices stating as far back as the 1950s that has given us the welfare system, encouraged single mom families, and basically eroded our foundational values. Finally, 2+1 does hold the perpetrator accountable....it is the ultimate accountability statement. it also mitigates the human loss of this individual's actions.

LTC Thomas Tennant - Not easy? An 18 year old in Uvalde, TX bought his easy enough. We know the results of that.
The shooter killing himself (which you label as accountability) does absolutely nothing to curb these actions.
And other that that, you posted the same old claptrap the conservatives have been spouting for years; if it is a problem, blame it on the liberals.

By the way, welfare started in 1935, not the 50's.
Now, how about subsidies to big Oil?
Or farm subsidies?

We could go on and on, but I would prefer to stay on 1 topic at a time.

Thank you.

Sgt (Join to see) - On that I agree with him. But I do not think he is trying to take away all guns.

MSG Stan Hutchison - And why ban the "assault rifle" when more people are killed by knives than by any type of rifle? More people are killed with "personal weapons" (hand, fists, feet) than are killed by any type of rifles.
The absolute vast majority of killings are due to handguns. Why push the assault rifle ban? Even the DOJs own study said the ban under Clinton had no affect.
Why? Obviously, the people are going to to kill people aren't going to worry about a gun law if they're not worry about murder laws. That's common sense.

Sgt (Join to see) - I do not necessarily think those guns should be banned, but I would support licensing them like we do with machine guns.

MSG Stan Hutchison - I'm against the government having a list of people who have certain firearms. Machine guns? Fine. Silencers? Fine. Where does it end?
Once they get that with the AR, then they'll "all of a sudden" realize that handguns kill way more people than rifles and soon you'll be doing the same with them.
Universal gun registration always comes before confiscation.