Posted on Jun 26, 2022
SCALISE: The Supreme Court Delivered A Major Victory For The Pro-Life Movement
845
48
38
5
5
0
SCALISE: The Supreme Court Delivered A Major Victory For The Pro-Life Movement
SCALISE: The Supreme Court Delivered A Major Victory For The Pro-Life Movement
Posted from dailycaller.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Congress
Supreme Court Congress
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 3
5
5
0
MSG Stan Hutchison
CPT Jack Durish - I would say they did fight. By first withdrawing from the Union, then,,,,
(1)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
CPT Jack Durish - Try what "crap"? Pointing out that opposing counsel is unprepared and wrong on both the facts and the law? Sure, I do it all the time. The best one was when, for my opening statement, I told the judge that if it wasn't for the fact that he would find me in contempt, I would use the opening argument of attorney Vincent Gambino from the movie "My Cousin Vinnie."
The judge had to cover his snickering with his hand, but I don't think that opposing counsel liked it too much.
The judge had to cover his snickering with his hand, but I don't think that opposing counsel liked it too much.
(0)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Capt Gregory Prickett - I like that. But your crap is simply stating an opinion without any supporting evidence as though your word is law. Give me something to debate with or so long pal...
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
CPT Jack Durish - Debra F. Greene, "Review of Why Confederates Fought: Family & Nation in Civil War Virginia", 48 J. Am. Studies, 161 (2007).
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
Dred Scott v Sandford: Black people are not and could not be citizens
Plessy v Ferguson: Racial segregation was lawful so long as public facilities were "separate but equal"
Roe v Wade: The unborn have no rights AND the Constitution includes a right to privacy
All three decisions were forced by popular demand despite the fact that popular demand has no place in a constitutional republic. Popular demand is a hallmark of democracy only (mob rule).
With the overturning of Roe v Wade, women still have rights, just as many as men. Sadly, we no longer teach our citizens that with rights come responsibilities. When people, men and women choose to have sex, they have a responsibility to the issue of that decision. They cannot avoid that responsibility under cover of some illusory right to privacy fabricated out of whole cloth.
Plessy v Ferguson: Racial segregation was lawful so long as public facilities were "separate but equal"
Roe v Wade: The unborn have no rights AND the Constitution includes a right to privacy
All three decisions were forced by popular demand despite the fact that popular demand has no place in a constitutional republic. Popular demand is a hallmark of democracy only (mob rule).
With the overturning of Roe v Wade, women still have rights, just as many as men. Sadly, we no longer teach our citizens that with rights come responsibilities. When people, men and women choose to have sex, they have a responsibility to the issue of that decision. They cannot avoid that responsibility under cover of some illusory right to privacy fabricated out of whole cloth.
(4)
(0)
SrA John Monette
CPT Jack Durish - How many other SCOTUS rulings and precedents have no constitutional basis? That's why we have the 9th.
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SrA John Monette - Dred Scott v Sandford (Blacks cannot be citizens) and Plessy v Fergusson (separate but equal). Both were justly overturned
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
CPT Jack Durish - The Dred Scott decision wasn't wholly overturned, it was superseded by the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments as to slavery and citizenship issues, and was only partially overturned in 1976 with the Kleppe v. New Mexico decision. Unless, of course, you have legal research that shows otherwise that you are willing to share.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google