Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Lt Col Charlie Brown
2
2
0
Good news
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC David Reid, M.S, PHR, SHRM-CP, DTM
2
2
0
Very Interesting!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Steve Sweeney
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
Okay? So what? So the judge ruled that the Democratic Party of Illinois can't intervene as a Defendant... so who IS the defendant? There was no final ruling on Judicial Watch's actual lawsuit. So what is the big deal and what do you mean by "two years"?

Furthermore, I disagree with Judicial Watch's contention that it would change the voting deadline as it would only apply to mail in ballots mailed and postmarked BEFORE the deadline set by law.

Do you feel a vote put in the mail before the deadline should be discarded because the mail service was not fast enough... especially given that may of those votes may be coming in from military personnel serving overseas?
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Special Forces Officer
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
I am providing information. My only comment is that it took two years to arrive at the decision.

Try as you might, you actually cannot read my mind.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
>1 y
CPT (Join to see) - I wasn't trying to read your mind which is why I asked you a question ... for clarification. For you to speak your mind. See how that works?

Tw years to arrive at what decision? You think they deliberated for two years before deciding that the Democratic Party of Illinois can't intervene as a defendant?

And while I cannot read your mind, nor will I try to tell you what you think, you might want to try to be clearer in your communication.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close