Posted on Mar 9, 2023
Tucker Carlson’s Jan. 6 footage sparks bipartisan outrage
519
36
14
6
6
0
My comment, "I watched both episodes produced by the Carlson broadcast. The compared footage by the Jan 6th committee produced by an NBC executive against non-edited footage presented by Carlson. There was a remarkable difference and it did not show the ideas that the committee portrayed. So which tape represents what really happened? You'll have to make up your own mind once you have seen the Carlson reviews. If we have a first amendment, why has Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called on News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch to block Carlson from airing additional segments along with others, including some republicans? On the other hand, there are both republicans and democrats that are raising questions that have not been answered previously. Is more information a terrible idea? Why were the original tapes not made available to counselors for the defense? Why has no one to date not been convicted of insurrection? Standford has expressed the January 6 insurrection was the gravest assault on American democracy since the Civil War and was parroted by POTUS and some democrats. Rep. Eric Swalwell of California advised Jan 6th was worse than the War of 1812. One person who was killed on Jan 6th that was a small-statured unarmed female veteran of 14 years named Ashli Babbitt. There were lots of injuries perpetrated by stupid people but no officer was killed on Jan 6th. Does this compare to the 620,000 Americans that were KIA in the Civil War? Does it compare to the 15,000 KIA during the War of 1812? Just asking."
@Lt Col Charlie Brown @COL Randall Cudworth
@Lt Col Charlie Brown @COL Randall Cudworth
Tucker Carlson’s Jan. 6 footage sparks bipartisan outrage
Posted from thehill.com
Justice
Congress
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 6
3
3
0
I find the Democrats duplicity astounding. The lawyer for Q man never saw the tapes despite requesting them. The Q man does has mental problems and was discharged from the service because of his mental problems, he had many years of service in the military.. At one point Q man offered a prayer for the police officers in the Senate Chamber. Now Thomas, the Chairman of the Jan 6 committee said only staffers were allowed to view the tapes and depended on them to be honest. The Democrats also depended on a TV producer to be honest. Was there any attempt by staffers to be fair in how and what was presented?
(3)
(0)
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - You're right on point. We only saw what they wanted us to see. Doesn't that represent data to fit the narrative they wanted the world to hear?
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - what put him in jail was hiding of exculpatory evidence. The best his lawyer believed he could get him, based off n the evidence he saw, was a four year plea deal BECAUSE HIS LAWYER DID NOT HAVE ACESS TO ALL THE EVIDENCE. Neither did the Judge who sentenced him.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
What we have seen thus far certainly supports your point. What I am asking, is if there is any additional information/video which has not surfaced or been discovered by Tucker's team, which points to a line crossed. The Q guy certainly appears to have issues and I am by no means interested in or condoning much of his reported behavior. But I also trust the word of law enforcement initially until I have been given reason not to. That trust has recently been questioned due to the latest release by Tucker. Because I respect those in law enforcement, I simply want to know what their response to this specific issue is. No blanket statements that they (Capitol Police) all did the right thing and that some of the folks in Congress trust the word of the Chief of Law Enforcement. That's fine... What has or would he specifically say in regard to why the Q guy was arrested and placed in jail? The ball is back in their court, and I am concerned it is not getting addressed.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
Transparency has never been a DC strong suit. Seems like the only politician in recent memory that is/was transparent was Trump (and he wasn't a politician). He would tell you every day what he was thinking and people hated him for it...strange.
The DC elite hates Trump and the Jan 6th Commission is just another example of getting rid of Trump by any means necessary. The ends justify the means.
The DC elite hates Trump and the Jan 6th Commission is just another example of getting rid of Trump by any means necessary. The ends justify the means.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
If the additional video was so bad and against what the Chief of Capitol Law Enforcement has stated, correct the record. Tell us why. Did the Q-dude become violent all the sudden, prompting his arrest? To be clear, I think the guy is nuts and it wouldn't surprise me if he crossed a line, but what was it? When did the protestors get out of hand in the eyes of the Capitol Police leading to the violence? Would they not agree that most of the event, while large and potentially overwhelming, started out peaceful and or manageable? Are there recorded moments where we can see the flashpoint of when the violence started to take shape?
The problem is, the government has a lot of evidence, recorded materials, and reasons to charge folks. But this all does not appear to be transparent, not only to the American people, but possibly to those charged as well. Instead, it definitely feels like information is being withheld. I get there are security reasons behind releasing certain things but those can still be addressed. "At a specified time in a certain location within the Capitol, subject Q became violent, as witnessed by multiple Capitol Police members and other bystanders." "We cannot release some of the information used to confirm this activity due to security reasons and for the safety of our elected officials and staff."
Sen McConnell made a blanket statement condemning Tucker and he needs to elaborate before I am going both understand and agree with his condemnation of Fox News. It feels like there's a piece of the puzzle which they cannot share explaining some of this. Unfortunately, with all the infighting between the parties, no one can be trusted.
The problem is, the government has a lot of evidence, recorded materials, and reasons to charge folks. But this all does not appear to be transparent, not only to the American people, but possibly to those charged as well. Instead, it definitely feels like information is being withheld. I get there are security reasons behind releasing certain things but those can still be addressed. "At a specified time in a certain location within the Capitol, subject Q became violent, as witnessed by multiple Capitol Police members and other bystanders." "We cannot release some of the information used to confirm this activity due to security reasons and for the safety of our elected officials and staff."
Sen McConnell made a blanket statement condemning Tucker and he needs to elaborate before I am going both understand and agree with his condemnation of Fox News. It feels like there's a piece of the puzzle which they cannot share explaining some of this. Unfortunately, with all the infighting between the parties, no one can be trusted.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google