13
13
0
“Sound of Freedom” was actually finished in 2018. But because it couldn’t get Netflix or a major studio in Hollywood to distribute it, it was independently financed by a Utah-based studio that specializes in religious projects.
Since it was released nation-wide on July 4, it has pulled in more than $50 million and become the surprise hit of the summer.
Variety’s critic called it “a compelling movie that shines an authentic light on one of the crucial criminal horrors of our time, one that Hollywood has mostly shied away from.”
But predictably, leftwing places like Rolling Stone, the Guardian and Slate have ripped “Sound of Freedom” for political reasons.
Instead of addressing the movie’s serious issue, they’ve discredited and smeared its deeply religious star, Jim Caviezel, who in 2004 played Jesus in “The Passion of Christ.”
Since it was released nation-wide on July 4, it has pulled in more than $50 million and become the surprise hit of the summer.
Variety’s critic called it “a compelling movie that shines an authentic light on one of the crucial criminal horrors of our time, one that Hollywood has mostly shied away from.”
But predictably, leftwing places like Rolling Stone, the Guardian and Slate have ripped “Sound of Freedom” for political reasons.
Instead of addressing the movie’s serious issue, they’ve discredited and smeared its deeply religious star, Jim Caviezel, who in 2004 played Jesus in “The Passion of Christ.”
Hearing the Truth About Sex Trafficking
Posted from patriotpost.us
Human Trafficking
Children
Movies
Hollywood
Money
Edited 11 mo ago
Posted 11 mo ago
Responses: 4
8
8
0
3
3
0
Liberals are going to slander it simply because of the religious beliefs of those involved to make political hay!
Liberals do NOT give a rip about the victims of human and sexual trafficking, not even about the ones who fall into the demographics they proclaim to advocate for.
Hell, they want to normalize pedophilia ffs!
And yes, the vast majority of liberals would rather see this film censored and destroyed than to address the real issue the film is about, except maybe Ashton Kutcher.
Liberals do NOT give a rip about the victims of human and sexual trafficking, not even about the ones who fall into the demographics they proclaim to advocate for.
Hell, they want to normalize pedophilia ffs!
And yes, the vast majority of liberals would rather see this film censored and destroyed than to address the real issue the film is about, except maybe Ashton Kutcher.
(3)
(0)
1
1
0
Of course they attack the message and the messenger. The left is all in on human sex trafficking. As evidence by their acceptance of Jeffrey Epstein's antics. Oh, wait. They don't like him after he got caught.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google