Posted on Sep 16, 2023
Sexual contact charge dismissed for ex-Fort Cavazos brigade commander
4.94K
6
8
2
2
0
Said it once, I'll say it again. Rank has its privileges. "Was based on an assessment of multiple factors including a careful consideration of the current evidence, the interests of justice, input from the alleged victim, and preservation of good order and discipline..."soo basically they plead the officer down, and another high ranking officer gets to skate on a sex charge. The military wonders why SHARP is an issue. PFC (Join to see) SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL LTC Stephen F. CPL Dave Hoover SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth SSG (Join to see) MSG (Join to see) Maj Kim Patterson LTC (Join to see) SFC (Join to see)
Sexual contact charge dismissed for ex-Fort Cavazos brigade commander
Posted from armytimes.com
SHARP
Crime
Punishment
Court Martial
Rank
Posted 8 mo ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
0
0
0
If it was dismissed then it would be slanderous to accuse him of said crime.. Considering you don't have a conviction to prove your claim true.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SSG(P) (Join to see) yes that is how it works... Making false claims about people puts at risk for defamation suit
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SSG(P) (Join to see) the presumption of innocence implies that without a conviction.. You can not prove truth to a solve the cause of action in the suit to slander.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SSG(P) (Join to see) essentially you are accusing him of a crime and you don't have a ROY to demonstrate this conviction... Other than slanderous innuendoes.. What evidence could you possibly demonstrate?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google