Avatar feed
Responses: 4
MAJ Ken Landgren
3
3
0
I don't understand it. Decent barracks is a basic leadership issue.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Randall C.
2
2
0
I think one of the issues is that there has been a polyfurcation of the responsibilities when it comes to the unaccompanied housing. Post housing is responsible for this and the military side is responsible for that. While the Army Barracks Management Program* lays out the responsibilities clearly, I often wonder how many who should be familiar with it are actually familiar with it.

Regardless, I'm very much in line with the view that proper barracks conditions are a function of leadership. If something is broke, you don't just put in a work order and say "well, DPM will fix it when they get around to it".

Where's the NCO following up on issues their Soldier's are having? Where's the commander involvement when that NCO doesn't get answers to the questions they are asking? At what point does the unit elevate the issue up to higher headquarters for awareness of senior post leadership when something becomes unacceptable?
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
MSG (Join to see)
3 mo
Every time I read articles about bad conditions on the barracks, my first question always is: "Where are the NCOs and does the 1SG know?" Because any 1SG that wants to remain a 1SG and a Commander that wants to remain a Commander will put boot to ass to get issues fixed. Or rather, they should be putting boot to ass.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Russell S.
0
0
0
Yea! More GS positions for retired guys to hang out in….
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close