Avatar feed
Responses: 2
Lt Col Aerospace Planner
1
1
0
Edited 3 mo ago
I think the target audience is going to be the younger generation in the various Information Operations career tracks (AFSC's). This will include, cyber, intel, and ISR related fields like RPA sensor operators and perhaps maybe even a small cadre of WO RPA (Drone) pilots. The Air Force has recognized that for years, despite six figure re-enlistment bonuses in those AFSC's, many airman saw long term financial gain by getting out and moving over to the contractor side where they were in the low six figure range of pay, negating the bonuses which would be parsed out over 4 to 6 years depending on the contract. The questions were, how do you keep a cyber warfare specialist in the ranks at $45k a year when they can take that specialty to Company X and be pulling a $135K starting per year? Same goes for Intel specialists and linguists who can find double to triple the pay. I think by adding a Warrant Officer track to these specialties may make a better incentive pay wise to keep the proficient and highly skilled talent in the ranks. They surveyed a lot of these folks in the past to find that a commission was not desirable to them as they noted the officers in most of these fields are doing more of the back shop leadership and admin duties over getting knee deep in the weeds with these skillsets. If money is a key factor for retention, it makes plenty sense that a WO track would be finally created.

How it in theory gets instituted in terms of W1 versus W2, that I don't think anybody can say at this point one way or another. I would think having it top out at W5 would make sense if you end goal is to retain the most seasoned of talent. Whether or not someone becomes a W1 or W2 from the start, perhaps it would depend on the skill level. Maybe a first term airman at a level 5 AFSC would get W1 and a second term NCO 7 level or above would rate a W2 and perhaps a mix of education and experience would be in play.

Like I said, its hard to say, I am sure the bulk of the proposed discussions will be how that is handled. Your guess is good as mine.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Bob Wilson
0
0
0
I believe it should be wide open with the WOs given the opportunity to be helicopter pilots. First Air Force requirement will be a College Degree [yes, Outdoor Basket Weaving will do]. The breakdown should be 15% College Graduates [the 22-30 year-olds]; 40% Senior NCOs [E7 and above]; and 45% Junior NCOs [E5-E6].
(0)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Aerospace Planner
Lt Col (Join to see)
3 mo
From all of the talks in various forums I have been privy to, aviation was never considered in discussions to bring back warrants. Barring of what we think the USAF needs to do based off of what we feel, will take a back seat to why the service is even considering them to begin with. The main thing will be to keep certain AFSC's that have a high attrition rate due to better opportunities on the other side of the base gate. There really is no need for recruitment in Aviation fields, the Air Force turns down people for flying slots still to this day even with the demands. Specifically rotor wing assets in we have. The Air Force has an extremely small RW footprint compared to the other services. Most UPT classes get maybe one or two rotor slots per class, some get more and in some cases some get none. The Air Force never really has a huge issue filling rotor slots. I don't see them making a WO pipeline to be frankly honest. Barring Guard and Reserve squadrons, I think you can count on one hand the amount of operational rotor squadrons in the active fleet.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW4 Keith Dolliver
CW4 Keith Dolliver
2 mo
It looks like the Air Force just officially said they are bringing back Warrant Officers and, while all the details aren't out yet, it looks like they will be mostly tailored to Cyber and IT fields as you suggested.

Now to play devil's advocate on the aviation/pilot front, and acknowledging that the USAF doesn't really have an issue recruiting for the aviation fields, it absolutely does have an issue retaining pilots. Some of that is just because of jobs and QOL on the outside, similar to the issues the USAF is having retaining cyber specialists, but how much is also because they are forced out of the cockpit to perform traditional office duties as the officers are promoted? How many pilots would you be able to retain if the USAF provided a career path that allowed officers to stay in the cockpit for their entire career? Every aviation unit in the Army that I was in had at least one Warrant Officer that was prior commissioned and reverted to Warrant so they could stay in the cockpit. While it wouldn't solve all of the retention problems, how many pilots do you think would choose that option if given a choice?

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/02/13/air-force-and-space-force-unveil-historic-changes-new-warrant-officer-ranks-training-structure.html
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Aerospace Planner
Lt Col (Join to see)
2 mo
I don't see WO's solving the retention problem either. They will bolt for the door just as fast as the commissioned pilots. Especially now that the part 121 airlines have removed the college degree requirement for now. Even the Army is seeing their rotorheads go to get rotor to fixed wing transitions on their own dime to get the ratings to get into the airline pipeline. Of course the Army sees this as a good thing, because after ending Afghanistan they had an overage of people. In about 10 years the military retention issues will probably be moot as by then, all the main carriers will be at full hiring capacity in the ability to get in the door will be much harder. There will be another 25 year reduced hiring gap again that won't affect new jobs until the current generation that is being born gets to adulthood. Being that the USAF has a 10 year service commitment after pinning on wings, the retention issues will be reduced. From what I understand the main thing that affects retention, is not having enough field grade types to fill staff roles as well as the future leadership positions. That is where the retention issues are and why they experimented with bringing back retired rated officers and reservists to fill those HQ level staff jobs.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close