Posted on May 21, 2024
NY v Trump: Judge to consider defense motion to dismiss after prosecution rests case
146
14
4
6
6
0
The day the United States of America turned into China (because Communist): When politicians and elected officials use the courts to persecute their political rivals. How sad... :(
NY v Trump: Judge to consider defense motion to dismiss after prosecution rests case
Posted from foxnews.comPosted in these groups: 
Political Opinions
Political Opinions
Posted 13 d ago
Responses: 2
5
5
0
It is my opinion this case will be discussed in law school classes for decades as one of the worst prosecutions in American jurisprudence. Judge Merchan will be the lead fall guy.
(5)
(0)
2
2
0
I want to be clear that I am making no statement regarding what *should* happen or even what *will* happen.
But the judge considering the motion means... well.... pretty much nothing. The judge MUST consider all motions brought before him. Now, he may consider for all of about 0.8 seconds, because it is a ridiculous motion, but he still considers. But even far-fetched but POSSIBLE motions must be considered in full. So, the judge considering this motion does NOT necessarily mean the motion has merit or is likely to be granted. (Again, I make no comment on whether it should or will.) It only means the judge sees a POSSIBILITY - however large OR small - that it MIGHT be granted.
But the judge considering the motion means... well.... pretty much nothing. The judge MUST consider all motions brought before him. Now, he may consider for all of about 0.8 seconds, because it is a ridiculous motion, but he still considers. But even far-fetched but POSSIBLE motions must be considered in full. So, the judge considering this motion does NOT necessarily mean the motion has merit or is likely to be granted. (Again, I make no comment on whether it should or will.) It only means the judge sees a POSSIBILITY - however large OR small - that it MIGHT be granted.
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Your statement gave me the best laugh of the morning. If the judge didn't consider points of law before the trial began, why would he consider a motion to dismiss. He is a hack whose family has received large amounts of money from organizations hostile toward President Trump. I could have very well tagged this post with Satire and Humor, but I didn't because we both know the tags would have been removes even though I find them humorous. :)
We both know this is a Kangaroo Court and a farce.
We both know this is a Kangaroo Court and a farce.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google