Posted on Mar 25, 2025
Is This the End for NSA Mike Waltz who Invited Far Left Media Hack into Private White House...
773
49
36
9
9
0
Posted 9 mo ago
Responses: 15
SGM Jeff Mccloud
COL (Join to see) oh, there was plenty of, "I do not recall, Senator" during the hearing.
(1)
(0)
COL (Join to see)
Yes but I was referring to the scene in the Oval Office when the President is getting advice minimizing his connection to the friend that was laundering drug money, and Jack Ryan goes the other way as says there's no use trying to defuse a bomb... after it's already gone off...
(0)
(0)
I see a number of possibilities with what we know so far. First, Jeff Goldberg might be making it up. It won't be the first time he has run with a fake story. Two, it's a security check and either Waltz or someone in his office failed. Three, Waltz screwed up and included the wrong guy. Neither of the last two is a good fit for an NSA guy.
(4)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
I believe I read it was confirmed the comms were not made up, and that Jeff did in fact get added to the group reportedly by mistake. That said, he could be characterizing it far more than what's really true. They could have simply been having a dicussion on policy, with no actual specifics to the command and control of US forces in the Yemen, and with already known actions we already stated publically that we will do. We don't know yet whether the comms were classified, or if there were any specifics that the enemy could have used to counter our attacks. This isn't to say what they did was acceptable, but we still do not have all the information. For all we know, maybe they did do this on purpose (doubt it), and that purpose has yet to be presented.
(4)
(0)
SGM Jeff Mccloud
CPT Lawrence Cable
First, we are well beyond the possibility that the story was made up, the DNI and CIR Dir both acknowledged a lot of what we already knew.
Two, using a real world operation to see who would have failed doesn’t sound like a smart idea.
And they all failed, no one noticed the editor in chief of the Atlantic, listed by full name, in the chat group.
But I will propose a novel theory: Waltz knew exactly what he was doing when he added a journalist to the e chat group.
First, we are well beyond the possibility that the story was made up, the DNI and CIR Dir both acknowledged a lot of what we already knew.
Two, using a real world operation to see who would have failed doesn’t sound like a smart idea.
And they all failed, no one noticed the editor in chief of the Atlantic, listed by full name, in the chat group.
But I will propose a novel theory: Waltz knew exactly what he was doing when he added a journalist to the e chat group.
(1)
(0)
It's not an internet site. It's an end-to-end encrypted chat app that even CIA uses for up to CUI information, and those retards think the lunch menu at Langley is classified "super duper secret, burn before reading."
I find it FASCINATING that out of all the random people who shouldn't be in that chat, it was specifically THAT PARTICULAR pathological liar who got added. Doesn't seem random or coincidental. Perhaps Waltz needs information security retraining because he got catfished by a Democrat propagandist scumbag?
I find it FASCINATING that out of all the random people who shouldn't be in that chat, it was specifically THAT PARTICULAR pathological liar who got added. Doesn't seem random or coincidental. Perhaps Waltz needs information security retraining because he got catfished by a Democrat propagandist scumbag?
(2)
(0)
LTC Matthew Schlosser
And I'm still waiting for you to back up your assertion that there was classified material in the texts. Put up or shut up!
(1)
(0)
SGM Jeff Mccloud
LTC Matthew Schlosser - Government officials have used Signal for organizational correspondence, such as scheduling sensitive meetings, but in the Biden administration, people who had permission to download it on their White House-issued phones were instructed to use the app sparingly, according to a former national security official who served in the administration.
The official, who requested anonymity to speak about methods used to share sensitive information, said Signal was most commonly used to notify someone that they should check for a classified message sent through other means.
https://apnews.com/article/signal-app-atlantic-war-plans-32699da142c5209b845e57f690df4925
as far as presenting evidence, the whole chat thread in this case, that's out of my hands, it's not released yet.
as far as evidence in general, I've noticed this has been a one way thing so far.
The official, who requested anonymity to speak about methods used to share sensitive information, said Signal was most commonly used to notify someone that they should check for a classified message sent through other means.
https://apnews.com/article/signal-app-atlantic-war-plans-32699da142c5209b845e57f690df4925
as far as presenting evidence, the whole chat thread in this case, that's out of my hands, it's not released yet.
as far as evidence in general, I've noticed this has been a one way thing so far.
What is Signal, the chat app used by US officials to share attack plans?
A magazine journalist’s account of being added to a group chat of U.S. national security officials coordinating plans for airstrikes has raised questions about how highly sensitive information is supposed to be handled.
(0)
(0)
LTC Matthew Schlosser
Uh, huh. So you asserted without any evidence that there is classified information in the chats. Got it.
(1)
(0)
SGM Jeff Mccloud
LTC Matthew Schlosser just to follow up here, after working with the CIA on releasing the rest of the chat, and the CIA still having to redact a name from the discussion (either source or target, they didn’t say), the whole rest of the chat is out, was addressed in the second day of intel oversight hearings, and you even have current republicans in office calling it “classified”.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Political Opinions
