4
4
0
Legislation being considered in Denmark
"More than just a privacy protection measure, it marks a radical shift towards protecting individuals from manipulation and exploitation in the age of AI."
"Denmark’s proactive approach could become the gold standard for deepfake laws in the European Union. By integrating strong copyright protection, platform responsibility, and digital identity protection measures, it addresses the risks posed by AI-generated deepfakes and strengthens public trust in the digital age."
Our U.S. efforts do not seem to have anything to do with protection of individuals - yet. . .
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48555
"More than just a privacy protection measure, it marks a radical shift towards protecting individuals from manipulation and exploitation in the age of AI."
"Denmark’s proactive approach could become the gold standard for deepfake laws in the European Union. By integrating strong copyright protection, platform responsibility, and digital identity protection measures, it addresses the risks posed by AI-generated deepfakes and strengthens public trust in the digital age."
Our U.S. efforts do not seem to have anything to do with protection of individuals - yet. . .
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48555
Just a moment...
Posted from thegoodlobby.eu
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Regulation
Denmark
Posted 1 mo ago
Responses: 2
3
3
0
Good idea, as AI progresses it is increasing difficult to tell from the real thing.
(3)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
There is a real problem on YouTube with exploitation. A.I. using likenesses of people (like Michio Kaku who should sue for all the ridicoulous contrived handwaving and poufy hair, if nothing else); using peoples' voices; plagiarizing all types of published material in any for; mixing fiction with fact because it can not differentiate between fact and fiction. It is easy to tell what fiction book or movie, or t.v series A.I is presenting as fact in some cases. YT is overburdened with A.I. channels too with no person or organization connected to the channel.
People have been trying to get YouTube to put an end to the problem since it is in a sort of a bellwether position to lead the way to needed changes before the current situation spreads and becomes worse - or not if profit is more important to YouTube . . .
What is encouraging are comments from people about videos they start to watch then stop watching as soon as they realize it is AI.
People have been trying to get YouTube to put an end to the problem since it is in a sort of a bellwether position to lead the way to needed changes before the current situation spreads and becomes worse - or not if profit is more important to YouTube . . .
What is encouraging are comments from people about videos they start to watch then stop watching as soon as they realize it is AI.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
It's understandable that US policy almost always lags actions (i.e., laws usually don't get passed until something happens to drive them). That said, AI has been cooking along for some time, but privacy is barely a concern in the US. My guess is that this will take a while before a law like this is passed in the US. And then, it will likely be along the line of revenge porn, such as the 2018 SHIELD Act, and it's follow-on legislation.
(1)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
CW3 Richard Doty And in the mean time several states have legislated laws of their own. Perhaps it will be easier to Legislate Federal laws by consolidating what works well in the States?
I don't know about the follow-up legislation, but that is one hugely prejudicial ignorant Act, imho. I guess more folks now know, in the past two years. what nation was the original problem. Two and three wrongs do not make a right, pf course, and trying to beat anyone or another nation at their own game, only makes a the competitor as bad or worse in many cases. Then they are blamed for the problem they did not start. "Kill 'em with Kindness" type diplomacy. of course, is way to lenient and also does not work in such circumstances when a long history of violations has not ever been decisively addressed as it should have been.
I don't know about the follow-up legislation, but that is one hugely prejudicial ignorant Act, imho. I guess more folks now know, in the past two years. what nation was the original problem. Two and three wrongs do not make a right, pf course, and trying to beat anyone or another nation at their own game, only makes a the competitor as bad or worse in many cases. Then they are blamed for the problem they did not start. "Kill 'em with Kindness" type diplomacy. of course, is way to lenient and also does not work in such circumstances when a long history of violations has not ever been decisively addressed as it should have been.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google