Posted on Feb 15, 2020
A Complete Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
338
5
4
4
4
0
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 2
Sir, The writer of this article is insulting half the population of this country. Not only is it condescending but it shows a level of ignorance which is exactly why the president will win re-election in 2020.
We can all agree to disagree without insulting the intelligence of others. I hope this was a joke on your part as I would never call Democrat’s idiots. You don’t win an argument when you insult the other side. Instead one should focus on finding common ground and debate each other with respect.
We can all agree to disagree without insulting the intelligence of others. I hope this was a joke on your part as I would never call Democrat’s idiots. You don’t win an argument when you insult the other side. Instead one should focus on finding common ground and debate each other with respect.
(1)
(0)
SPC Carlos R.
MSgt Steve Sweeney The author is clearly bias against Trump and his supporters. His article was not objective at all.
“ It should be strongly emphasized that not all Trump supporters are racist, mentally vulnerable, or fundamentally bad people” - The assumption is most are, etc.
”That being said, it is just as harmful to pretend that there are not clear psychological and neural factors that underlie much of Trump supporters’ unbridled allegiance.” - He is assuming people who support Trump do have underlying psychological problem.
Do you want me to go on. The whole article is bias. For a Ph.D he did an extremely poor job at being factual without imputing his on political bias into his research.
“ It should be strongly emphasized that not all Trump supporters are racist, mentally vulnerable, or fundamentally bad people” - The assumption is most are, etc.
”That being said, it is just as harmful to pretend that there are not clear psychological and neural factors that underlie much of Trump supporters’ unbridled allegiance.” - He is assuming people who support Trump do have underlying psychological problem.
Do you want me to go on. The whole article is bias. For a Ph.D he did an extremely poor job at being factual without imputing his on political bias into his research.
(0)
(0)
Next up by this same author. The same analysis for the Democrats. Especially Adam Schiff and good old Nancy. Can't wait to see what he would have to say as a liberal psychologist.
(0)
(0)
LTC Lee Bouchard
Like the post above, I would believe some but not all. I usually question much of what I read no matter the source.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next