Posted on Apr 17, 2023
A Prolific Pro-Russia Propaganda Channel is Run by a US Navy Veteran
5.04K
11
8
2
2
0
I have been concerned for awhile now that what we consider to be honest differences between service members, may not always be quite as innocent as we expect. The 1st Amendment guarantee's an American's right to express their opinion freely and openly. I cannot criticize the Leftist suppression of conservative speech, and then turn around and suppress their pro-Communist China speech. Of course if we go to war with any other nation, that country's agents of influence (if US Citizens) will immediately become vulnerable to charges of:
Treason (18 U.S. Code § 2381 ): "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer __death__, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
We should always take everything we hear, read, or see with a grain of salt.
Treason (18 U.S. Code § 2381 ): "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer __death__, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
We should always take everything we hear, read, or see with a grain of salt.
A Prolific Pro-Russia Propaganda Channel is Run by a US Navy Veteran
Posted from military.com
Online Media
1st Amendment
Espionage
OPSEC
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
"We should always take everything we hear, read, or see with a grain of salt"
Words to live by, ESPECIALLY on Social Media.
Words to live by, ESPECIALLY on Social Media.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
I don't trust the Ukrainians any more than I do the Russians as far a 'misinformation" is concerned. These days, I am almost of the opinion that when you here that something is "misinformation" from either side, it probably means that what was said has some truth to it?
I don't think I am the only one cynical enough here to have suspected that the Intelligence Agency might be using Jack Teixeira as a patsy to "leak" information that may have been coming out of other sources about the status of the Ukrainian Army and Government.
25 years ago, it would have been the lead STORY in the NY Times.
And for all of the throwing around of the word Treason, the Constitution says that it requires that we be at war with the country, the act be witnessed by at least two people.
ARTICLE III
Section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
I don't think I am the only one cynical enough here to have suspected that the Intelligence Agency might be using Jack Teixeira as a patsy to "leak" information that may have been coming out of other sources about the status of the Ukrainian Army and Government.
25 years ago, it would have been the lead STORY in the NY Times.
And for all of the throwing around of the word Treason, the Constitution says that it requires that we be at war with the country, the act be witnessed by at least two people.
ARTICLE III
Section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
(2)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
The Rosenberg's would probably disagree with your contention that it requires witnesses (doesn't) and that requires that a state of war to exist before you can be charged with same. I'm not throwing anything around and I already mentioned that war was traditionally a component of the charge.
Nevertheless, please send me a full citation with dates for what you are quoting and I will make any necessary retractions.
Thanks.
Nevertheless, please send me a full citation with dates for what you are quoting and I will make any necessary retractions.
Thanks.
(0)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT (Join to see) - Rosenbergs were not convicted of Treason, they were convicted of Espionage. The date on the Article III of the US Constitution being adopted was March 4, 1789.
(0)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
Even MSN is publishing the idea that Teixeira is a patsy. Apparently some in the CIA don't like the Neocon/Neolib warmongers either. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pentagon-leaker-jack-teixeira-didnt-act-solo-says-former-trump-intel-official/ar-AA19Uh4O
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Please provide a “leftist” source of Chinese propaganda and an example. Twitter under Elon Musk allegedly allowed right wing accounts to run rampant along with Chinese propaganda for a flawed business strategy.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/11/elon-musk-slashed-twitters-safety-team-then-a-chinese-spam-campaign-ran-rampant
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/11/elon-musk-slashed-twitters-safety-team-then-a-chinese-spam-campaign-ran-rampant
Elon Musk Slashed Twitter's Safety Team. Then a Chinese Spam Campaign Ran Rampant
Twitter’s scaled-down anti-propaganda team struggled to contain Chinese-language accounts tweeting adult content—spam suspected to be linked with China's government in order to drown out news about protests over COVID-19 policies. “Looks like we might have the first major failure to stop gov interference in the Musk era,” said one cybersecurity expert.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
First and foremost realize that this is not a personal attack directed towards you or anyone with whom I have, or have had, a disagreement with.
For at least the last seven years there has been a cacophony of silence on the massive human rights abuses of the Peoples Republic of China. When I say abuses I mean, the invasion and suppression of Hong Kong, the murder of countless civilians in Shanghai (the price of resistance?), the engineering of a deadly virus followed by its irresponsible release, the forced sterilization and abortions inflicted upon Hmong women, and the turning of a blind eye towards the murder of the Hmong associated with forced organ donation (for profit - $). This is of course a short list of offenses that come immediately to mind. It isn't our government's functionaries who are guilty, but the majority of the Leftist intelligencia are right there with them. To the intelligent but terribly misled leftist "aristocracy", one can also add the vast majority of actors, musicians, dancers, and other members of the performing arts. These are many but certainly not all of the leftist's that overtly or covertly assist Communist China.
For at least the last seven years there has been a cacophony of silence on the massive human rights abuses of the Peoples Republic of China. When I say abuses I mean, the invasion and suppression of Hong Kong, the murder of countless civilians in Shanghai (the price of resistance?), the engineering of a deadly virus followed by its irresponsible release, the forced sterilization and abortions inflicted upon Hmong women, and the turning of a blind eye towards the murder of the Hmong associated with forced organ donation (for profit - $). This is of course a short list of offenses that come immediately to mind. It isn't our government's functionaries who are guilty, but the majority of the Leftist intelligencia are right there with them. To the intelligent but terribly misled leftist "aristocracy", one can also add the vast majority of actors, musicians, dancers, and other members of the performing arts. These are many but certainly not all of the leftist's that overtly or covertly assist Communist China.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google